Any1 Help!? Ok so i was working on question
In which following function was given \[f(x) = a_{n} + \sin(\pi)X for x \in [2n ,2n+1]\]
and f(x) = \[b _{n} + \cos (\pi) x for x \in (2n-1,2n)\]
now while going through the solution in the book , i came across this \[f(2n+1)^{+}) = b _{n+1}-1 \]
i dint get it , How is RHL of f(x) approaches 2n+1 is \[b _{n+1}-1\]
i dint get the \[b _{n+1}\] Part , How come we get this?
@Loser66
This is the ^ link to the whole question
@jdoe0001
@radar
@skullpatrol
If you're wondering where that +1 comes from, it's because Cos(2kpi) where k is an integer is always 1.
actually i got that i m wondering abt bn+1 part
Oh you mean \[b_{n+1}\]
Yes!
Ah I see.. They're checking the last endpoint, x = 2n+1
the first part is fine:\[a_n+Sin\pi x\]is defined on [2n, 2n+1]
yes, I m confused abt the second part :(
\[b_n+Cos\pi x\]is only defined on (2n-1, 2n), I think they're just incrementing everything for that reason
I mean the ns
hmm, yea but why increment n by 1. as it is defiend on (2n-1,2n) so if we have to increment by 1 that wud be for 2n , for 2n+1 we should be incrementing by 2? idk i m confused
something like:\[b_{n+1}+Cos\pi x\]being defined on: (2n-1+1, 2n+1)
hmmm
sounds legit
or at least that's what i think they're doing. they don't need to add 2, as that's not required by the question
but RHL of 2n+1 wud be value greater than 2n+1 , it doesnt contain in (2n-1+1,2n+1) interval, what do u think?
for LHL we can use (2n-1+1,2n+1) , but for RHL that interval would not be valid, dont u think so?
true...
@phi can you explain this to us? http://assets.openstudy.com/updates/attachments/52f7f86be4b043c0f358e674-cybershadow-1391985919363-img.png
i think u have a mod helping you- your fine :P
|dw:1391990078152:dw| First, these functions abut each other as we increase n, alternating a+ sin, b+cos,
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!