If V is a finite dimension vector space, x, y are in V, is it true that \(x\otimes y\) = \(y\otimes x\) Please, help
Do I have to separate it into cases: 1/ x, y are in the same basis, then x \(\otimes ~~y\) = \( y ~~\otimes~~x\) 2/ if they are in different basis, then x \(\otimes~~y\neq x\otimes y\)
If I remember correctly, cross products are anticommunitive, that is x⊗y = -y⊗x It's been a while since I did vector spaces though.
but I need proof for whatever I say, Pleeeeeeeeeease
because orientation matters in vector spaces, the only case where x⊗y = y⊗x is true, would be the case where x,y are null vectors (x=0,y=0). For proof you can do an example, pick any two not null vectors and do both cross products, they will have different answers.
how do u define \(\otimes\) ?
I did, but I confused. Let x, y are in R^2. {(1,0) , (0,1)} is the basis of R^2 let x = (1,2) and y = (2,0 ) in R^2 , so, x = ( e1 + 2e2) , y = (2e1) x \(\otimes y\) = (e1 +2e2) \(\otimes~~ 2e1\)
=(e1\(\otimes 2e1)+ (2e2 ~~\otimes ~2e1)\)
\(y~\otimes x = 2e1\otimes (e1+2e2)=(2e1\otimes e1 )+ (2e1\otimes 2e2)\) are they the same? I see they are the same but they are supposedly not.
@helder_edwin it's notation for cross product. \[\large\vec{x}\otimes \vec{y} =\left[ \begin{matrix} \textbf{i}& \textbf{j} & \textbf{k} \\ x_1 & x_2 & x_3 \\ y_1 & y_2 & y_3\\ \end{matrix} \right] = \left[\begin{matrix} x_2& x_3\\ y_2&y_3\\ \end{matrix} \right]\textbf{i}-\left[\begin{matrix} x_1& x_3\\ y_1&y_3\\ \end{matrix} \right]\textbf{j}+\left[\begin{matrix} x_1& x_2\\ y_1&y_2\\ \end{matrix} \right]\textbf{i}\]
OK. But this operation is only defined in R^3. Not in any finite dimensional space vector.
And u were right. It is not commutative. This can be seen from the definition u just posted. (The last i should be k, though.)
indeed it should, as it happens that's a lot of latex to type out, lol. Also, the question didn't mention what degree space we were in, so i assumed R^3.
I agree: a lot to type.
Question: tensor product = cross product?
NO !!
why? my lecture uses \(\otimes \) to indicate tensor product. I am sorry for that. I mean the tensor product
that is the correct notation for tensor product, I assumed you meant cross product for a couple reasons, mostly relating to the fact that tensor products don't show up on here nearly as often as cross products :X sorry about that.
if it is tensor product, then?? the conclusion??
yes. that was strange. that's why I asked for the definition. The symbol \(\otimes\) is (as far as I know) solely used to denote the tensor product. While the cross product is denoted by \(\times\) and is only defined in R^3.
when it comes to modules, \(\otimes\) is not exactly an operation so it is not commutative. this comes from the definition of the tensor product of modules. (U can check any book in homological algebra.) but when it comes to vector spaces, i don't really know. but I guess it is not true. again from the definition (construction) of a tensor product.
Thank you
u r welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!