Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (usukidoll):

Let \(f: X \rightarrow Y, g: Y \rightarrow Z\) and \(h: Z \rightarrow U\). Prove that for all \(T \in P(U), \bar( h \circ g \circ f)^{-1}(T)=\bar f^{-1}(\bar g^{-1} (\bar h^{-1}(T)))\).

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

-.- Let \(f: X \rightarrow Y, g: Y \rightarrow Z\) and \(h: Z \rightarrow U\). Prove that for all \(T \in P(U), \bar( h \circ g \circ f)^{-1}(T)=\bar f^{-1}(\bar g^{-1} (\bar h^{-1}(T)))\).

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

let's see.. why can't I just use the distributive law to solve my iissues? lol that' snot the case

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what is \( P(U)\)?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

so f has an element x with element y g has an element y with element z and h has an element z with element u...

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

that's supposed to be POWERSET(U)

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

|dw:1392883759659:dw|

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

so this is preimage not inverse?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

yes ^^

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

what if we use some lemma.. which states that we let X and Y be nonempty sets and let f: x -> Y be a function... If f is an injection, then there exists a surjection g : y -x such that g o f =Ix If f is a surjection, then there exists an injection g: y ->x such that f o g = Iy ?????

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How about this, take \(f\) of both sides. Then take \(g\) of both sides, then take \(h\) of both sides.

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

so that would be just ... wait do I multiply both sides of f or ?!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ f((h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)) = g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)) \]Then\[ (g\circ f)((h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)) = h^{-1}(T) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Basically: \[ \color{red}{(h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)}= \color{blue}{f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)))} \]Then\[ f[\color{red}{(h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)}] = f[\color{blue}{f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)))}] \]The RHS simplifies to: \[ f[(h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)] = g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

...

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

wait how did you get it so fast? like when did the ff^-1 become just g^-1h^-1 T?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ f(f^{-1}(\ldots )) = \ldots \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In this case \(\ldots = g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T))\)

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

so does the ff^-1 cancel out?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

?! what properties of functions did you use?!

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

This went too quickly... so what did you do for take f on both sides?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Start out with \(T=T\)

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

:S T = T is this from a property or a lemma or letting T equal to \[f((h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)) = g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, \(T=T\) is something that we know is true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thus we can start with it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Actually, maybe we should start with: \[ h(g(f(T))) = (h\circ g\circ f)(T) \]Does this at least make sense?

OpenStudy (primeralph):

Divide by 0.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now, we put \(h^{-1}(\ldots)\) on both sides: \[ h^{-1}[h(g(f(T)))] = h^{-1}((h\circ g\circ f)(T)) \]Cant we use \(h^{-1}(h(\ldots)) = \ldots\)

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

@primeralph divide by 0?! really I thought that's undefined already?!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@UsukiDoll Do you understand what I'm doing?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

we're starting from h first... then take the h^-1 on both sides

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We get \[ g(f(T)) = h^{-1}((h\circ g\circ f)(T)) \]

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

h^-1 (h) just disappears... from the left side... :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Eventually you get \[ T = f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}((h\circ g\circ f)(T)))) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let \(X = (h\circ g\circ f)(T)\) then \(T = (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(X)\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Substitute and get: \[ (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(X) = f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(X))) \]

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

so first we're taking h^-1 both sides... then maybe g^-1 both sides and f^-1 both sides to finally get to where we are

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And... I probably should not have used \(X\) because it is already defined here... so instead...

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

use ... B?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Change \(X\) to be \(T\). Change \(T\) to be some \(A\in \mathcal P(X)\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That way instead of ending with \(X\) you end with \(T\)s, which is less confusing.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you understand it?

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

if I do it backwards starting with h^-1 on both sides then I do...but for forward... should I take f^-1 on both sides first followed by g^-1 and then h^-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You technically can't do it forwards, because you would be assuming the thing you're trying to prove is true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

However, sometimes doing this forwards gives us an idea.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sometimes, I feel you won't be satisfied unless I write a verbatim proof.

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

oh I see I'll start on the left hand side of the equation on this one... doing h^-1 then g^-1 and f^-1

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

on both sides of course ^^

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

either way since professor I love to grade harsh is the teach....no matter what I do I still have some points knocked out

OpenStudy (anonymous):

To be more rigorous, you'd start with \[ \forall A\in \mathcal P(X) \quad h(g(f(A))) = (h\circ g\circ f)(A) \]

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

alright...hmm I wonder if any definitions were used...theorem 5.5.11 Let X and Y be sets. Let f: X->Y be a function, and let g be an inverse of f. Then the following hold... both f and g are bijections, f is an inverse of g, g is the unique inverse of f. ... uniqueness of the inverse..........

OpenStudy (anonymous):

First we show:\[ \begin{array}{rccc} \forall T\in \mathcal P(U) \quad& (h\circ g\circ f)(A) &=& T \\ & (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}((h\circ g\circ f)(A)) &=& (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T)\\ & A &=& (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T) \end{array} \]Next we show: \[\begin{array}{rccc} \forall T\in \mathcal P(U) \quad& (h\circ g\circ f)(A) &=& T \\ & h(g(f(A))) &=& T \\ & h^{-1}(h(g(f(A)))) &=& h^{-1}(T) \\ & g(f(A)) &=& h^{-1}(T)\\ & g^{-1}(g(f(A))) &=& g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T))\\ & f(A) &=& g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T))\\ & f^{-1}(f(A)) &=& f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)))\\ & A &=& f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T)))\\ \end{array} \]Then with we combine:\[ (h\circ g\circ f)^{-1}(T) = A = f^{-1}(g^{-1}(h^{-1}(T))) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please tell me you get it...

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

back...my pc crashed right as I was about to type something

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!