Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

a block of mass 5 kilograms moves to the right with constant velocity 8m/s and falls off a cliff of height 200m. 1) How long will it take to hit the ground? 2) What is the distance from the bottom of the cliff where it will land? 3) How fast will the block be moving just before it hits the ground?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok are you familiar with projectile motion, kinematics, and vector components?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah I am

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok, so you're familiar with x and y directional motion being independent of one another right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

uh I only know the general formulas I'm not sure what you're talking about

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok so right now, while the block is on the cliff, it has no motion in the y-direction, only x-direction. This means that when it shoots off the cliff, it's initial velocity in the y-direction is 0 even if it's initial velocity in the x-direction is 8m/s You have to calculate the motion in the x and y directions separately. Make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh alrite yeah

OpenStudy (roadjester):

so right now, the easiest thing to do is find the time it takes to hit the ground first. For this use the kinematic equations and do the calculation in the y-direction. I recommend using this one: \[\huge y_f=y_i+v_yt+{\frac 1 2}a_yt^2\]

OpenStudy (roadjester):

know what to substitute?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

200= -4.9t^2 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

would yf be -200?

OpenStudy (roadjester):

close. your signs are off. time is never negative; besides, you can't take the square root of a negative number your final position is 0, your initial position is 200, and your gravitational acceleration is -9.8m/s^2

OpenStudy (roadjester):

make senese?

OpenStudy (roadjester):

sense*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh so initially its starting from 0 height to final being 200?

OpenStudy (roadjester):

no no,

OpenStudy (roadjester):

\[\large y_f=0m\] \[\large y_i=200m\] \[\large g=-9.8m/s^2\] \[\large {v_y}_i=0m/s\]

OpenStudy (roadjester):

do these numbers make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes! they do thank you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got 6.3s for time

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Don't look at me; that is what I got but is it what's in your solution (if you have it)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah after taking the squareroot of 400/ 9.8

OpenStudy (roadjester):

I meant the answer your book gives, if your book gives the answers I mean.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yeah the solution manual has 6.39 as the answer. But I was just confused about taking x and y independently but you cleared that up :)

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok cool so that is correct. Do you need help with (B) and (C)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think i got c but could you help me with b please

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok so part b is looking for, according to your picture, the length d

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Now the time it takes to hit the ground has to remain consistent. That means that you already know how long it takes for the block to reach the distance d

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right

OpenStudy (roadjester):

if the block is moving at a constant velocity, what is it's acceleration?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

there's no acc

OpenStudy (roadjester):

exactly

OpenStudy (roadjester):

\[\large x_f=x_i+v_0t+ {\frac 1 2}at^2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x= 0 +( 8 )(6.39) +0 making x final 51.12m

OpenStudy (anonymous):

gotcha thank you! :)

OpenStudy (roadjester):

That's what I say, what does the book say?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it says the same answer

OpenStudy (roadjester):

cool.

OpenStudy (roadjester):

so did you solve part c?

OpenStudy (roadjester):

to be honest I got 62.61m/s but am not as sure on that as the other two

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for c the answer is rounded to 63

OpenStudy (roadjester):

oh well. Did you need me to explain that one or have you got it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

uh could you explain it please I don't think i'm doing it right

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok for this one you want to work in the y-direction

OpenStudy (roadjester):

\[\huge {v_y}_f = {v_y}_i + a_y t\]

OpenStudy (roadjester):

In the y direction, the block is in free fall. So you don't have an initial velocity. Well you do but it's 0.

OpenStudy (roadjester):

And acceleration is simply gravitational acceleration. You found time in part a

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah but my professor used pythagorean theorem or something of that sort to find v

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (roadjester):

OH ok, I see; I messed up

OpenStudy (roadjester):

Do you know how to find the magnitude of a vector?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a^2+b^2 =c^2 ?

OpenStudy (roadjester):

not quite

OpenStudy (roadjester):

ok so when you have a vector \[\huge \vec v\] In order to break it down into it's two components you have \[\large v_x=\vec vcos\theta\] \[\large v_y=\vec vsin\theta\] What we've been doing in regards to velocity is using v_x and v_y. Agreed?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah

OpenStudy (roadjester):

now to get the final velocity you need to add the two components together, so while you are correct that it is the pythagorean theorem, you are looking for c.|dw:1393100396497:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!