I have a vector field F(x,y) and a hyperbola; I'm supposed to calculate the work from the field on a particle traveling on the right curve of the hyperbola; how do you go about deciding a good parametrization?
For example: 1/4*x^2-1/9*y^2=1 from (2*sqrt(5),-6) to (2*sqrt(2),3)
lets try... i did line integrals very long back.... is that a real example problem ? if so, where is the vector field ?
The vector field is (1/4*x^2,1/6*x^2)
Thoughts? :D
isnt the work is the derevative ?
\[\int\limits_{\alpha}^{\beta}(P(x(t),y(t))x'(t)+Q(x(t),y(t))y'(t))dt\] Is the work of the field F=(P,Q) along some curve (on differential form).
sorry i dont know , still learning these stuff :)
a dumb way wud be to parameterize :- x = 2cosht y = 3sinht
Why dumb?
uhmm lets try it
Oh, you mean it's a hassle? :d
x= 2 sec(t) y= 3 tan(t)
Why?
x=2cosh(t),y=3sinh(t) gives a crazy t interval, no? :c
logs take over :o
try sec and tan..
What about the interval for t?
This shouldn't be so hard. :(
yup! i think logs wud make hyperbolics easy... finish the hyperbolic parametrization first maybe...
log(sqrt(5)+sqrt((sqrt(5)-1) (1+sqrt(5))))<=t<=log(sqrt(2)+sqrt((sqrt(2)-1) (1+sqrt(2)))) This does not feel right.
\(-\log (2+\sqrt{5}) \le t \le -\log (\sqrt{2} - 1) \)
Supposedly not right. :/
This problem is driving me nuts!
wat do u mean not right ?
it doesnt look that pleasant, but it does look right to meh
Apparently not :C
The answer is supposedly gnarly though.
hmm-
Is your field \[ \left ( \frac {x^2}4, \frac {x^2}6 \right) \] There is no y?
There is no y.
If the second component is in terms of y, then it would be very easy. That is why I am asking.
I think that your teacher should not ask such a question that yields to complicated integrals.
I tend to agree, the problem is generated through RNG though.
What is RNG?
Random number generator
With restrictions of course.
There is for sure one trick to make this easy.
It should be known, that between all integrals that you can generate, very few can be done by hand. The others might need numerical approximations.
It's generated to be hand-solved with relative ease.
The trick that I was looking for is was that the field is conservative, but it is not.
If you find an easy solution, please let us know.
Here is an idea \[ \left ( \frac {x^2}4, \frac {x^2}6 \right)= \left ( \frac {x^2}4, 0 \right)+\left ( 0, \frac {x^2}6 \right) \]
The first one is conservative and the work for it depends of the end points. You need to complete the work done by the second.
You need to compute \[ \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac 1 6 x(t)^2 y'(t) dt \]
Try it
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!