A machine wants to make 110 parts, and it initially takes 200 seconds to make each part. Each time 5 parts are made, the time it takes to make a part is reduced by 2 seconds. However, there is a curve to how fast the machine can make parts. As the machine reaches the production curve, less time is saved for each 10 parts. Starting at 70 parts, each 10 parts will only save 1 second. At 80 to 89 parts made, the machine only saves 0.5 seconds of time per part. From 90 to 110 parts made, the machine only saves 0.1 seconds. How long will it take to make the 110 parts?
@mathbrz
the problem is a bit unclear. If parts 66-70 take x seconds, do parts 71-75 take x-2 seconds, x-1 seconds, or x seconds?
I posted a similar problem to this before, and used summation to solve it
Well, it's a straightforward problem, except for understanding exactly where the production rate changes...
\[5\sum_{0}^{69}(200-2x) + 1\sum_{1}^{9}(62-x)+0.5\sum_{1}^{9}(53-x)+0.1\sum_{1}^{20}(44-x)\]
hmm, the answer for that seems to be > 110*200, which should be an upper bound on the answer...
No, I interpreted it differently. Parts 1-5 take 200 seconds each Parts 6-10 take 198 seconds each Parts 11-15 take 196 seconds each Parts 16-20 take 194 seconds each Parts 21-25 take 192 seconds Parts 26-30 take 190 seconds Parts 31-35 take 188 seconds Parts 36-40 take 186 seconds Parts 41-45 take 184 seconds Parts 46-50 take 182 seconds Parts 51-55 take 180 seconds Parts 56-60 take 178 seconds Parts 61-65 take 176 seconds Parts 66-70 take 174 seconds Parts 71-75 take 173 seconds Parts 76-80 take 173 seconds parts 81-90 take 172.5 seconds Parts 91-110 take 172.4 seconds
I mixed up my previous problem with this
Starts out at 200 seconds per part, and after 5 are made the process is improved to take 198 seconds per part. And so on, but exactly when the improvements slow down is hard to pin down from the description.
Taking you're break down, I can just do it on paper. I was trying to express is using summation, but I'm not that good at it
*your
As I wasn't under any obligation to do the problem in the "correct" way, I just added it all up without bothering to construct the summation equation: 5*200 + 5*198 + 5*196 + 5*194 + 5*192 + 5*190 + 5*188 + 5*186 + 5*184 + 5*182 + 5*180 + 5*178 + 5*176 + 5*174 + 5*173 + 5*173 + 10*172.5 + 20*172.4 But, I'm not all that convinced that I interpreted the problem correctly when the enhancements taper off... My result ended up averaging just a bit over 180 seconds per part, which is around parts 46-55 and thus right in the middle as you would expect with a mostly linear speedup.
I may have mistyped those details. I think you're right
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!