Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

If f:R -> R is lebesgue measurable and g:R-> R is continuous. then g(f(x)):R->R is lebesgue measurable.

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

@eliassaab it seems to me that this should say f(g(x)) is lebesgue measurable. is the way I asked in the question true?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

again, if you are sick of me tagging you, let me know. But I figure I am keeping you sharp on your measure theory:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you for keeping me sharp on something that I did all my life

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you know how to do it?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

nope. I thought I did, but i can do f(g(x)), but not quite sure about g(f(x))

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

so I need to show that the pre image of any open set is in M. so the preimage of f of an open set is lebesgue measurable but im not sure how to show that the preimage of g of a lebesgue measurable set is lebesgue measurable. but all I have is that g is continuous.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let M be an open set \[ (g f)^{-1} (M) = f^{-1}( g^{-1} (M)) \] Since \[ g^{-1} (M) \] is open then \[ f^{-1}( g^{-1} (M)) \] is measurable and hence fg is measurable. The other way is not true in general, see http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/283443/is-composition-of-measurable-functions-measurable

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

so if g is continuous and f is Lebesgue measurable then its not true (in general) that \(g\cdot f\) is Lebesgue measurable?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!