Hyperbolic functions:
omg
hard to eyeball all of them but just as cosine is even, so is cosh, and C is the proof
For some of these, they play some very subtle tricks on you...
think the first one looks good too \[\cosh(x)+\sinh(x)=e^x\] for sure
Yea, the cosh(-x) was the first one I knew could be right.
first is right as well
like for (c) cosh(x) = 1/2 (e^x + e^(-(-x)) ) = 1/2 (e^ {-x} \(\color{red}-\) e^{x} ) where does that negative sign come from?
cosh(-x) = 1/2 e^(-x) <-- i wrote that part incorrectly
I think for that one they factored out a -1?
It does have a sign change
Oh wait, nvm I looked at the wrong side
well, the only negative signs are in the powers. you can't really convert the power into a multiplication of -1. And to factor out that -1, it would be coming from both e^(-x) and e^(x). ;x
oh doh i wasn't paying attention it says "which one is PROVED correctly" not "which identity is right
first one is proved correctly for sure (i think)
We never did get see cosh(-x)=cosh proved so I'm not sure if that one is right >_<
i agree, first one looks good to me. cosh (-x) = cosh (x) is almost true, except instead of that negative sign: \( \cosh (-x) = \dfrac{1}{2} (e^{-x} + e^{-(-x)} ) = \dfrac{1}{2} (e^{-x} + e^{+x} ) \) that's just a matter of commutative property now,
it is true, the proof is wrong replace \(x\) by \(-x\) in \[\frac{1}{2}\left(e^x+e^{-x}\right)\] and you get it right away
Alright so first off, do you even KNOW what cosh(t) and sinh(t) are? They satisfy the following equation on the unit hyperbola, \[x^2-y^2=1\] where x=cosh(t) y=sinh(t)|dw:1395451512447:dw| So when x=1 then obviously we can see on the graph above that y=0 since x^2-y^2=1. Also note that the cosh(t) (t is just the hyperbolic angle) will give you the same answer if we travel to positive or negative amounts since you will always have something 1 or greater while since sinh(t) tells you the y-part of the hyperbola you can easily see how it'll be positive on the top and negative on the bottom. They're really similar to the trig functions for the circle. Think about them. Play with them. Also note that they are both their own second derivatives, not their own negative second derivatives like the circular trig functions are, which is interesting.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!