. You walk over to settle the debate. They are discussing a function g(x). You take out your notepad and jot down their statements. Professor McCoy: She says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because long division with (x + 2) results in a remainder of 0. Ms. Guerra: She says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because g(2) = 0. Mr. Romano: He says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because synthetic division with 2 results in a remainder of 0. Correct the reasoning of any inaccurate reasoning by the party-goers in full and complete sentences. M
wow what in interesting party they really stretch to make these "word problems" don't they?
they really do haha
the statement "2 is a zero of g(x) because g(2) = 0" is correct that is what it means for 2 to be a zero
the statement " 2 is a zero of g(x) because long division with (x + 2) results in a remainder of 0" is incorrect
it would be long division by \(x-2\) not \(x+2\)
the statement "He says that 2 is a zero of g(x) because synthetic division with 2 results in a remainder of 0" is probably meant to be correct, but it is written badly
"synthetic division WITH 2" makes no real sense synthetic division is division if you put at 2 in the box on the side, you are dividing by \(x-2\) so i guess you are supposed to say it is right illiterate, but right
thanks so muchhhhh
yw now leave that party and go to one with women and booze
yea ikr
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!