Arianna kicks a soccer ball off the ground and into the air with an initial velocity of 42 feet per second. Assume the starting height of the ball is 0 feet. Approximately what maximum height does the soccer ball reach?
@ganeshie8 @whpalmer4 @zzr0ck3r
@UnkleRhaukus @RadEn @shamil98
@eliassaab @timo86m @chmvijay
\[h(t) = -\frac{1}{2}gt^2 + v_0t + h_0\]\[g=32\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{s}^2}\]\[v_0=42\frac{\text{ ft}}{\text{ s}}\]\[h_0 = 0\text{ ft}\] The formula is that of a parabola, \[y = ax^2 + bx + c\]where the vertex is located at \(x = -\dfrac{b}{2a}\) Plug that value into the formula to find the corresponding y value for the vertex (except here we'll be calling it \(h\)).
what does that mean?
It means the function relating the height of the ball with respect to time is a parabola, and the maximum height will be at the vertex of the parabola.
yes is it 128 ft?
@whpalmer4
I'm afraid you are not even close...care to show me your work?
oops what the heck i don't know why i wrote 128 i meant 272 ft
@whpalmer4
You're getting even less close :-( How about you show me your work?
hmmm. maybe my formula is wrong
what formula should i use?
I gave you everything you need...
it would probably be easiest if you just humored me and told me how you got these answers
i guessed
jk im not sure what I'm doing wrong then
is x=−b/2a the formula?
@whpalmer4
Okay, here's the height formula I gave you: \[h(t) = -\frac{1}{2}gt^2 + v_0t + h_0\]When you plug in the various numbers specified in the problem, what is that formula?
OH okay thank you i got 224 ft
@whpalmer4
???
no, please just tell me what that formula looks like after you have inserted the values of \(g\), \(v_0\), and \(h_0\)
are you sure its not 224? i double checked and all.
@whpalmer4
I'm 100% positive. Look, either you show me your work, or I leave.
Once again: height of the ball is given by \[h(t) = -\frac{1}{2}gt^2+v_0 t + h_0\]\(h_0\) is the initial height of the ball \(v_0\) is the initial velocity of the ball \(g\) is the acceleration due to gravity, \(32 \text{ ft}/\text{s}^2\) Please write out the formula after you have inserted those values.
0(t)=−12(32)2+(42)t+(0)
thats what i get when i plug in the height velocity and acceleration
not -12, -1/2 and h(t) doesn't turn into 0(t)
\[h(t) = -\frac{1}{2}(32)t^2+42t+0\]\[h(t) = -16t^2+42t\]
so i have to solve for t?
@whpalmer4
No. That's a parabola. You're looking for the maximum height the ball reaches. This parabola (because the coefficient of the \(t^2\) term is negative) looks like an inverted bowl, with the top of the arc being at the vertex. The vertex of such a parabola can be very easily found by dividing the coefficient of the \(t\) term by twice the coefficient of the \(t^2\) term and changing the sign. That gives you the value of the independent variable (here, \(t\)) at the vertex. You then plug that value into the formula for the parabola to find the value of the dependent variable (here, \(h(t)\)), which will be the maximum height the ball reaches.
i got 27.5625
@whpalmer4
That is correct.
WOOOHOOO!
Thanks!
Here's a graph with the axes labeled and two lines showing t and h(t) at the vertex
Another way you could have found the answer in this particular case is to remember that a parabola is symmetrical about the perpendicular line connecting the directrix and the vertex. Because the initial height was 0, the two solutions where the height is 0 are located symmetrically about the vertex, and if you factored the equation, you would get \[-2t(8t-21)=0\]leading to \[t=0,t=\frac{21}{8}\]as the solutions where the height is 0. Halfway between them is \(t = \dfrac{21}{16}\) which is the same value you get from the \(-\dfrac{b}{2a}\) formula. However, if we had \(h_0\ne0\) then this approach would not work so conveniently (one of the solutions would involve a negative value of \(t\) rather than 0).
okay thank you so much for all your help @whpalmer4
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!