Question

@preskill89 Since I am not extremely scientifically inclined in particle physics, and my degree in science is purely theoretical (haha), do you mind answering my mundane question about your experience in CalTech? What do you think of the environment there and how do you recommend it over another learning platform such as MIT? I have extreme admiration for you and would love to hear your insight.

Furthermore, how was it like starting your own institution, the Institute for Quantum Information within Caltech, in 2000? I know you were already established at that point as a forefront of these sciences.

Answer 1

Also, if you don't mind answering another question, do you see quantum computing becoming a reality in the near future? Or is there not a basis existing yet for which it could be developed?

Answer 2

Caltech is generally an "exclusive" institution and is a lot smaller than other top institutions such as MIT or Stanford, both statistically and physically. Due to the smaller student body, classes are usually more flexible, which makes it easier to bond and make connections with ours students. At Caltech, we primarily tend to boast our superior physics and engineering departments, along with our world-class faculty members.

Answer 3

Hello, Professor Preskill.

This website has been populated by high school mathematics, physics, chemists. We are glad and humbled to see you here. I have only faintly been introduced to quantum mechanical systems. Please do not mind if I am vague with my question. But to start with, should I study quantum mechanics if I'm oriented towards a career? Is it better than engineering? Also, I'm not as good as someone as yourself to become a respected researcher.

Answer 4

I second @ParthKohli, it's very humbling to see you on this website. I, for one, is still a student so it's very informative to hear your advice.

Answer 5

Quantum computing is very real and very possible to see in the near future. As we slowly transition to a more technological stage, we are beginning to solve a lot of unanswered questions that can potentially lead to "new" physics, such as advancements in the phenomenon of quantum entanglement and superposition.

Answer 6

Is it theoretically possible to execute with today's technology on the smaller scale, even if it would require an inordinate amount of energy, or is possible but not currently?

Answer 7

What are your thoughts on the work-to-real-life-result ratio pertaining to research-work in fields such as Physics and Mathematics? Is it adequate for us? Should we focus on engaging a high quality or high quantity in such fields?

Answer 8

Omg.. I can't believe this but it's really ... I have to say hi John Preskill!!! It's amazing to have here in Openstudy!(:

Answer 9

@ParthKohli
QM is generally for innovative people who are passionate about mathematics and discovery. However, individuals that tend to pursue careers involving QM have an indefinite aspiration in becoming a professor and aren't concerned about other workplace factors (wages, environment,etc.).

Answer 10

If everyone could redirect their questions to my inbox, that would be great.

Answer 11

I have received 20+ messages at once. I will try to get to everyone.

Answer 12

Haha Alright. (:

Answer 13

Nice to meet you Professor. I look forward to getting associated with you in the future.

Answer 14

:)

Answer 15

I just found this article online
http://newsreport.us.com/j-preskil-on-web-based-social-learning/
Exciting... ! :D

Answer 16

I don't think that's the real John Preskill lol