If f(v) is expressed as d = v + .2v^2, why is f(2v) expressed as d = 2v + .8v^2? If all terms are doubled, wouldn't it be expressed as d = 2v + .4v^2? The textbook doesn't explain why the second coefficient is quadrupled rather than doubled.
Remember that when something is written as f(2v), we're plugging that into all values of v.
Thus, f(2v) = 2v + 0.2 (2v)^2
f(2v) = 2v + (0.2)(4)(v^2)
f(2v) = 2v + 0.8v^2
I think you forgot to square the two.
OH! I was looking at it as (2v) + (.2) (2v^2)
In my logic, I was thinking that if d = v + .2 v^2 then the entire expression doubled would be d = 2v + .4 (2v^2)
Yes, it's an easy mistake to make. If the entire expression is doubled, then it would be written as 2f(v) instead of f(2v)- but I don't think you need to learn that yet.
Darlin, I am 40 years old and am about to get my AAS in Cisco Network Admin. That is EXACTLY what I needed to learn :)
What? Oh my gosh, I assumed you were taking introductory algebra and were a year or two behind me. xD
it simply has been 21 years since I was in high school. This class is Tech Math aka College Algebra. I simply need a few things reminded :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!