partial derivative
\[u=e^{-\alpha^2k^2t}sinkx\]
with respect to t
I took log on both sides \[lnu= -\alpha^2k^2t sinkx\]
\[\frac{ 1 }{ u }=-\sin(kx)\alpha^2k^2\] \[u_t=-\sin(kx)\alpha^2k^2\]
*u
so \[-\sin(kx)\alpha^2k^2 e^{-\alpha^2k^2t}sinkx\]
@AccessDenied
they asked to prove u=.... same as \[u_t=\alpha^2_{xx}\]
so I took with respect to u_xx
I got \[-k^2e^{\alpha^2k^2t}\sin(kx)\]
so finally my ans is \[sin(kx)alpha^2u_{xx}\]
I am not following the extraneous work... From \( u = e^{- \alpha^2 k^2 t} \sin (kx) \) Taking the partial derivative with respect to t, we consider every other variable a constant. \( u = e^{- \alpha^2 k^2 \color{red}t} \sin (k x) \) Everything other than the t marked in red is like a constant, so the partial derivative is the equivalent to taking this derivative with respect to t: \( u = e^{A t} \times B \) Where A and B are constants.
lol I typed those for nothing. Anyways ^= \[e^{At} AB\]
Yep. Then we just replace A and B with what was originally there in its place. \( A = -\alpha^2 k^2 \), \(B = \sin (kx) \)
okay, will this work if I use logs
As in, \( \ln u = \ln \left( e^{-\alpha^2 k^2 t} \sin (kx) \right) \) and then take the derivative?
ya ln and e cancels
ohhh but ln for sin stays right?
The product property would apply. \( \ln u = \ln \left( e^{-\alpha^2 k^2 t} \right) + \ln \left( \sin (kx) \right) \) \( \ln u = -\alpha^2 k^2 t + \ln \sin (kx) \) Which would work, you take the partial derivative and the ln(sin (kx)) cancels out to 0.
okay got u thx
Then we just have to watch for chain rule in the end. \( \ln u = -\alpha^2 k^2 t + \ln \sin (kx) \) \( \dfrac{1}{u} u_t = - \alpha^2 k^2 \) \( \dfrac{1}{e^{-\alpha^2 k^2 t} \sin (kt) } u_t = - \alpha^2 k^2 \)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!