Can you show me mathematically that the p orbital has 2 phases? And how did we deduce this well known shape of p orbitals? I have part of an explanation here with trig: http://sketchtoy.com/60156646 What I don't understand in this is that, to me, the length indicated by cos²φ is supposed to be cosφ but they're considering cosφ to be the hypotenuse! What do you think? Can you help? I'm really confused Thanks in advance.
Is this for physical chemistry?
Yes! It's not really required as it seems that students take such things on faith and move on but I'm curious
Notice that this is really a function in polar coordinates saying \[r= \cos \phi\] You're thinking about what happens when you have a constant radius, but here the radius changes depending on what angle we're at. But don't fear, what you really should think is: |dw:1397430307583:dw| What is cos(phi)? It's the adjacent side divided by the hypotenuse, correct? \[\cos \phi = \frac{\cos^2 \phi}{\cos \phi}\] I don't know if that clears it up, but you just need to remember that the radius depends on phi and is not a constant. Here's a little graph to show: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=r%3Dcos%20theta&t=crmtb01
Thank you! I understand better now but one thing still bothers me. How come it's okay to just say that the length is equal to cos²φ? You can't just pick any length as long as it cancels out and gives the right thing, right?
Well you're thinking of two different triangles as if they're the same. All the graph of r=cos(theta) is saying is that you can start plugging in angles and at every angle the radius changes based on that. So if we graph a bunch of points, maybe it'll be clearer (theta, r) a=(0,1) b=(pi/4, sqrt(2)/2) c=(pi/2, 0) d=(3pi/4, -sqrt(2)/2) e=(pi, -1) |dw:1397511758273:dw|
yeah, i just accepted it. I didn't, nor do I have plans on becoming a physical chemist.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!