let A = power set of ℝ. Define f: ℝ->A by formula f(x) = {y∈ℝ | y^2 < x}. Is one-to-one? is it onto?
suppose f(x1) = f(x2). I'm trying to determine whether x1 = x2. So far I got, f(x1) = {y∈ℝ | y^2 < x1} f(x2) = {y∈ℝ | y^2 < x2} the fact that f(x) isn't a real number throws me off, thus, I don't really know how to solve for x1 and x2 and show they are (or are not) equal
Well, \(f(x)\) is a just a set of real numbers.
right, f(x) is a set, which isn't a number
Consider \(x=0\) and consider \(x=-1\). That will give away the answer.
x = 0 then f(0) is a set of y that y^2 < 0, which is a empty set. x = 1 gives -1 < y < 1
ok?
I said \(x=-1\) not \(x=1\).
oh... f(-1) also gives an empty set. Ah so f isn't one-to-one
The onto part should be pretty obvious as well.
f is onto right?
Think about it for a few seconds.
Consider a function: \[ g(x) = \frac{1}{x-3} \]Would it's domain be in \(A\)? If it is, then \(f(x)\) has to map to it.
its^
{3} isn't in A
First of all, the domain would be \(\mathbb R \setminus \{3\}\).
Is \(\mathbb R \setminus \{3\}\subseteq \mathbb R\)?
yeah
For that matter is \(\{3\}\subseteq \mathbb R\)?
no
oh wait yeah
How are you defining the power set?
set of all subsets
Okay, so why would you think it isn't in \(A\)?
You said \(A = \mathcal P(\mathbb R)\)
oh {3} is indeed in A
Does \(f(x)\) ever map to \(\{3\}\)?
huhm.. so I need to find an x such that f(x) = {3}, which is impossible. So f is not onto
I see now. Thank you!
Can you prove that \(\forall x\quad \{3\}\notin f(x)\)?
huhm.... suppose x in R, then -sqrt(x) < y < sqrt(x)
What?
i just solved for y
ok
The way I see it is given, x > 0, f(x) will be a set that has an equal length, and {3} doesn't have a length. So, x > 0 works. Now I need to consider x <= 0, which will gives an empty set
I see where you are going. Another idea: \(3\in f(x) \implies 3^2<x \implies 2^2<x \implies 2\in f(x)\). So \(\{3\}\notin f(x)\) since \(2\notin \{3\}\).
you meant to say {3} ∈ ℝ right?
wait wait typo
you meant to say {3} ∈ f(x) ?
I mean to say \(\{3\}\notin \text{Im} [{ f(x)}]\)
how does {3} ∈ f(x) => 3^2 < x?
No, it is \(3\in f(x)\).
It returns a set of real numbers, not a set of sets
but f(x) is a set...
Yes, \(f(x)\) is a set. I'm saying suppose that \(3\) is in that set.
ohh.... :o
If \(3\) is in the set, then \(3^2<x\). We know that \(2^2<x\) based on this fact. This means \(2\) is also in the set.
I see
Well, your proof that \(0\) must be in \(f(x)\) or \(f(x)\) must be empty also works.
you mean the proof I gave that f(x) is either empty or a set that has a length?
Whoops, I didn't read it thoroughly, I thought you were going to say something like either it is empty or \(0\) is in it.
ok :D
well, I did say that -sqrt(x) < y < sqrt(x), so yeah either f(x) is empty or 0 is in it. I didn't thought of it this way when I said it. All I did was merely solving for y. But now I see the connection to what I did
once again, thank you for your time ^.^
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!