Can someone help me find the height of these inscribed rectangles. I know the width is 1...
@ganeshie8 @thomaster
@mathslover @amistre64
It is hard to read off the height from the graph, but you can use the equation they give you y = 3x-4
For example, the red rectangle starts at 2. at x=2, y (the height) is 3*2-4= 6-4=2
To get the total area I add the area of all 3 rectangles together?
Yes. You are "estimating" the area of the triangle by adding up the areas of the 3 rectangles.
Can the whole part be treated as a trapezium? And then using the formula for calculating the area of trapezium ?
the area of each rectangle is width * height width (as you said) is 1, so area = y of each rectangle
If it is treated as a trapezium then we can solve it like this : |dw:1397578258873:dw| \(\textbf{Area of Trapezium } \quad = \sf{ \cfrac{(a+b)\times h}{2} \\ }\) a and b are the lengths of parallel sides and h is the height of the trapezium h = BC = 3 units a = AB = 2 units b = CD = 11 units
but am i finiding the total area of all the rectangles? or just for each one.
@phi
the question says: Use the area of the 3 inscribed rectangles to estimate the area of the triangle. That means find the area of each rectangle and add them up. The sum will be a (low) estimate of the area of the triangle.
you should first find the heights of each rectangle: if you use the equation of the line (which forms the triangle) y = 3x-4 at x=2 , y = 2 x=3, y= 5 x=4, y= 8
Thanks.
The estimate is obviously not very good... but in calculus they use this exact idea, but with *lots* of *very skinny* rectangles... it turns out to work very well for find the area under a curve.
Yes, as per the question, you need to just use the 3 rectangles. It will make difference of 4.5 sq. units to the original area.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!