Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 23 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Charles Schenck, a U.S. citizen, was responsible for printing and distributing leaflets that explained why he was against the draft (required military service) during World War I. He was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917, a federal law that outlawed any action that got in the way of military operations. Charles believed that the law in question violated his right to free speech. In which court would this case be tried, and why? A state court because it involved violation of criminal law. The Supreme Court of the United States because it involved constitutional law. A count

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A county civil court because it involved violation of civil liberties. A military tribunal because the matter involved prospective military draftees. are the other options :(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i thought it was D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

probably b because he thought his right to free speech was infringed upon and constitutional rights tend to come before other laws

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think B also .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

B is the best answer because it has to do with constitutional laws not any of the other laws.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!