Hey, so I'm having trouble with this AP Calculus problem and I was wondering if anyone would explain why the answer is what it is? I'll attach the document- I don't understand Question 5, part b.
this looks like a differential equation to solve
oh silly me the solutions are given! i didn't scroll down that far
I don't understand why the second derivative of W being greater than zero proves part (a) to be an underestimate.
And honestly, I don't really understand part (c) at all either...
part b i can explain
the second derivative being positive means the function is concave up the real definition of concave up is that any tangent line lies below the graph or at least the real definition when you write down what exactly the above means in any case a picture will show that if the function is concave up the line lies below the graph
|dw:1397784941643:dw|
Oh, wow, I never knew that. I'm glad to know that now. Thank you very much!
actually i lied, the real definition of concave up is that any secant line lies above the curve|dw:1397785017617:dw|
but both things are true
yw
Awesome :) Yeah, I didn't know that so when I saw the problem's explanation I just felt even more confused.
as for C solving the differential equation, the steps are there in the solution if you haven't seen them before it could be confusing, but they are all there i think
basically any time you have \[f'(x)=f(x)\] or some expression involving \(f\) (in this case it is \(f'(x)=\frac{1}{25}(f(x)-300)\) then the solution will be the exponential in some form
I think I need to review separation of variables and differentiable equations. I'll keep that in mind- I have trouble trying to pick my first step so that'll definitely help. Thank you :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!