Brainteasers! Medal for the first to answer correct! At a party, everyone shook hands with everybody else. There were 66 handshakes. How many people were at the party? This is just for fun, I already know the answer. First one to answer correctly gets a medal!
let me think first
@amistre64 @hartnn @iPwnBunnies Can you figure it out? :)
dont forget you cant shake your own hand
I am working on it now
I would guess but like, I would only think of the 66 hands that were shaken, unless there is a number of people who had already shaken hands. i think i'm thinking too hard
I'm not seeing how it can be 66, if everybody shook each other's hands...
yea true
now that you mention it.
and then its asking how many people were at the party, and everyone has 2 hands, so if you half 66 you get 33 so i think 33 o_o
Ok, this formula will help: \[\frac{ n(n+1) }{ 2 } = 66\] :)
LOGIC has failed me!!!!! T_T
lol
Are you saying people shake hands twice. ._.
66
Hey people are weird like that.
Think of it this way, you have 1 person who shakes everyone's hand, yet everyone does that, and in total, 66 hands were shaken, how many people were at this party :) its obviously not 66 because the total is going to be bigger than the number of people there since each person shook more than one.
You guys want the answer?
yes yes
12
12
Ok, the answer is 12 :)
Ah, I see it now.
Explanation: In general, with n+1 people, the number of handshakes is the sum of the first n consecutive numbers: 1+2+3+ ... + n. Since this sum is n(n+1)/2, we need to solve the equation n(n+1)/2 = 66. This is the quadratic equation n2+ n -132 = 0. Solving for n, we obtain 11 as the answer and deduce that there were 12 people at the party. Since 66 is a relatively small number, you can also solve this problem with a hand calculator. Add 1 + 2 = + 3 = +... etc. until the total is 66. The last number that you entered (11) is n.
yep :)
Fun brainteaser site :) http://dailybrainteaser.blogspot.com/2012/12/hard-math-problems.html And don't worry, I couldn't figure it out either lol.
assume 1 person shakes 65 hands and leaves the room then 1 person shakes 64 hands and leaves the room then 1 person shakes 63 hands and leaves the room ... when 1 person is left, the shake no hands and just leave ... how many handshakes were given?
lol, i read the question backwards, but im sure that can be worked around to match this question
So 66 people must have started in the room because that 1 person started shaking hands with 65 people, right?
yes, but i read this as 66 people in a room, how many handshakes; but the sequence is arithmatic either way
Then instead of the formula: \[\frac{ n(n+1) }{ 2 } = 66\] It will be: \[\frac{ n(n-1) }{ 2 } = 66\] right?
this is a good question - i'd see it before. Its pretty clever really.
if there are n in the room, then n-1 handshakes then n-2 hand shakes then n-3 hand shakes ... then 1 handshake then 0 handshakes add up to 66 shakes altogether
let me chk\[\frac{(n-1)(n-1+1)}{2}=66\] \[\frac{n(n-1)}{2}=66\] yes
So then: \[n = 12\] :)
solving the quadratic gets us n=-11 or n=12
yep
And since there cannot be negative people, the answer is 12 lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!