Help please :) The polar coordinates of a point are unique. Is this false?
I think it is
It depends on what it means by unique. Each point in a polar coordinate system is unique, just like all coordinates in a rectangular (\((x,y)\)) coordinate system are unique. If you pick out any point, there is only one way to describe that point. It has its specific \(r\) and \(\theta\). Do you use \(r\) and \(\theta\) as your variables?
oh ok yeah I was just given this as a hint to my problem set in my book Each set of polar coordinates describes a unique point, or location, in the polar coordinate plane.
Right! So, if you have a point like \((5,\ \pi)\), there are no other coordinates to describe that point.
However a particular point can be described using several coordinate pairs. that's the continuation
that part is what confused me
A typical way to say this when you prove uniqueness, I think, is to say that if \((r_1,\ \theta_1)\) are the coordinates that describe a point, and \((r_1,\theta_2)\) describe that point, then \(r_1=r_2\) and \(\theta_1=\theta_2\). That's what it means to be unique!
Okay! For that, think about \((5,\ \pi)\) Now, if you're talking about vectors, you can add two vectors to get a third. So I think that, \((2,\ \pi)+(3,\ \pi)=(5,\ \pi)\) But I'm not sure if we have to go back into rectangular coordinates to see what operations we can allow.
I wonder if \((1,\ 0)+(1,\ \pi/2)=(\sqrt2,\ \pi/4)\) is valid notation. |dw:1398567192361:dw| What does it continue to say?
I'll be back in a few hold on
Np!
Which set of polar coordinates describes the same location as the rectangular coordinates 4,-4?
So, you know where \((4,-4)\) is as a rectangular coordinate!|dw:1398571540148:dw|
So, how would you find the polar coordinate, \((r,\theta)\)?|dw:1398571638540:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!