Medal to person who can help me..... Use a graphical method to determine the approximate interval for which the second order Taylor polynomial for ln(1+x) at x=0 approximates ln(1+x) with an absolute error of no more than 0.04... I have no idea where to start. My book does a bad job at explaining series problems--especially this special case.
@jim_thompson5910
@timo86m
@ganeshie8
@Luigi0210
@dumbcow
Sorry, only in calc I.
Oh well. Thank you very much regardless.
First you have to find the second order taylor polynomial for ln(1+x) centered at x = 0
any ideas on how to do that?
well its derivative right? Well then that entails yo uto find derivative of ln(1+x) which is 1/1+x. Now second order, so find 2nd derivative so now its -(1+x)^-2. Right?
so far, so good
now how do you use those derivatives to find the taylor polynomial?
I'm pretty sure its plug in zero for x since that is what you are subsitituting for. Plus I use McLauren Series cause its centered at x=0..... So the taylor series would be....\[\ln(1+x)=1+-.5x\] Right?
Just for 2nd order thats why I went only to two right?
when you plug x = 0 into the first derivative, you get 1/(1+0) = 1/1 = 1 You divide this by 1! = 1 to get 1*1 = 1 Then you multiply that result by (x-0)^1 = x^1 = x So the first term of this taylor polynomial is x
for the second derivative, you plug in x = 0 to get -1/(1+x)^2 = -1/(1+0)^2 = -1 Then you divide this by 2! = 2*1 = 2 to get 1/2 and then you multiply by (x-0)^2 = x^2 The second term is (-1/2)x^2
So overall, the 2nd order taylor polynomial is x - (1/2)x^2
call that T(x), so T(x) = x - (1/2)x^2
I do not mean to insult you at all in any manner but are you sure?
yes, I'm sure
have a look at this page if you're not sure http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/TaylorSeries.aspx
ok cool. now what?
f(x) is the original function, so f(x) = ln(1+x) the difference in the two functions is f(x) - T(x) = ln(1+x) - (x - (1/2)x^2) = ln(1+x) - x + (1/2)x^2
Why are we subtracting the Taylor polynomial by the function?
If T(x) perfectly matched up with f(x), then f(x) - T(x) would always be zero but that's not the case. There's error. So that's why f(x) - T(x) is for the most part nonzero
we subtract to calculate the error E(x) E(x) = |f(x) - T(x)| and we have those absolute value bars in there to make sure the difference is always positive
oh ok so now the error is ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2 ? Now do I substitute the .04 error in the equation? If so this makes sense haha
the error is E(x) = |f(x) - T(x)| which is the same as saying E(x) = ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2 we then plug in E(x) = 0.04 since we want the error to be 0.04. Solving for x will give you the values of x that make E(x) = 0.04 true
sorry I meant to say E(x) = |ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2|
How do we get the upper and lower limit? The answers given in the multiple choice consists of an inequality involving an upper and lower limit...?
tell me what you get when you solve |ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2| = 0.04
you can do so graphically by plotting y1 = |ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2| y2 = 0.04
or you can plot y1 = |ln(1+x) + x + (1/2)x^2|-0.04 and find the roots
Oh Ok I see. I understand now. Thank you veyr much. You just solve with one equaling 0.04 and the other -0.04 Am I correct? From there you have the limits. Cool Thank you!!!
well if you don't use absolute values, then yes, you'll use 0.04 and -0.04
it will turn out that everything between those two solutions will have the error smaller than 0.04 anything outside that interval will have E(x) > 0.04
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!