Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (rational):

help with induction proof http://prntscr.com/3hnvcf

OpenStudy (rational):

n = 1 : \(a_1 = 1 \lt 2^1 \) so the given statement is true for n = 1

OpenStudy (ilovecake):

;)

OpenStudy (ilovecake):

correct:)

OpenStudy (rational):

ty :) im clueless on next step :(

OpenStudy (ilovecake):

oh

OpenStudy (rational):

would it be like induction proof from first principle : assume \(a_k = a_{k-1} + a_{k-2} + a_{k-3}\lt 2^k\) and prove \(a_{k+1} \lt 2^k\)

myininaya (myininaya):

I would do three cases for the base case. For a1,a2,and a3. You want to assume your statement is true for every integer out to some chosen integer value k and then you want to show it is true for k+1. So let's consider the case of k+1 \[a_{k+1}=a_k+a_{k-1}+a_{k-2}\] we need to look at a_(k-1) and a_k So we know a_k<2^k and a_(k-1)<2^(k-1) by our assumption

myininaya (myininaya):

oops and a_(k-2) so we have also a_(k-2)<2^(k-2)

OpenStudy (rational):

oh that makes sense 3 base cases ! and yes using second principle we have : \(a_{k} \lt 2^{k} \) \(a_{k-1} \lt 2^{k-1}\) \(a_{k-2} \lt 2^{k-2} \)

OpenStudy (rational):

\(a_{k+1}=a_k+a_{k-1}+a_{k-2} \lt 2^k + 2^{k-1} + 2^{k-2}\)

myininaya (myininaya):

yep good so far do you want to try to figure out the trick into showing <2^(k+1)?

OpenStudy (rational):

I'm trying at the moment lol, need to make the right hand side 2^{k+1}

myininaya (myininaya):

I used what I wanted to show to help me start out I don't know if that helps you

OpenStudy (rational):

im getting right hand side as : \(2^{k-2}(2^2 + 2 + 1) = 2^{k-2}(7)\)

OpenStudy (rational):

not sure how to conclude... only if that 7 was 8... :o

OpenStudy (nipunmalhotra93):

use 7<8

OpenStudy (rational):

it has to be \(\ge 8 \) i think

myininaya (myininaya):

I liked factoring out 2^(k+1) instead of 2^(k-2) but you should be able to proceed as you are

myininaya (myininaya):

and nip is right we want <

OpenStudy (nipunmalhotra93):

you have your term <2^(k-2) (7)<2^(k-2) (8)=2^(k+1)

OpenStudy (rational):

so far i have this : \(a_{k+1}=a_k+a_{k-1}+a_{k-2} \lt 2^k + 2^{k-1} + 2^{k-2} = 2^{k-2}(7)\)

OpenStudy (rational):

Ohhh yess !

OpenStudy (nipunmalhotra93):

yeah factoring out 2^(k+1) will do too.

OpenStudy (rational):

thanks a lot that was easier than it looked initally to start wid lol xD

myininaya (myininaya):

or I liked: \[a_{k+1}<2^k+2^{k-1}+2^{k-2}=2^{k+1}(2^{-1}+2^{-2}+2^{-3}) \] \[=2^{k+1}(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8})=2^{k+1}(\frac{4+2+1}{8})=2^{k+1}\frac{7}{8}<2^{k+1} \frac{8}{8}=2^{k+1}(1)=2^{k+1}\] Both ways are cute

myininaya (myininaya):

both ways require you to know 7<8 that is interesting

OpenStudy (nipunmalhotra93):

yeah. :D

OpenStudy (rational):

hahah yes this looks easy to read quick :) thank you both :D

myininaya (myininaya):

hey rational here is another proof you can look at that has the same style we just worked with http://php.scripts.psu.edu/djh300/cmpsc360/ex-strong-induction.htm

OpenStudy (nipunmalhotra93):

you're welcome (Y)

OpenStudy (rational):

the proof in that link is very good !! cleared up the mechanics of strong induction thank you very much @myininaya

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!