The figure below shows a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC.
so... What's the question?
Let me show you
Ted makes the chart shown below to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC. Statements Justifications In triangles APD and BPC; DP = PC Sides of equilateral triangle DPC are equal In triangles APD and BPC; AD = BC Sides of square ABCD are equal In triangles APD and BPC; angle ADP = angle BCP Angle ADC = angle BCD = 90° so angle ADP = angle BCP = 60° Triangles APD and BPC are congruent SAS postulate What is the error in Ted's proof? He writes the measure of angles ADP and BCP as 60° instead of 45°. He uses the SAS postulate instead of AAS postulate to prove the triangles congruent. He writes the measure of angles ADP and BCP as 60° instead of 30°. He uses the SAS postulate instead of SSS postulate to prove the triangles congruent.
do you have a picture or something? or is the problem just like this?
The problem looks like half of them are in a statement the other half in a justification
STATEMENTS In triangles APD and BPC; DP = PC In triangles APD and BPC; AD = BC In triangles APD and BPC; angle ADP = angle BCP Triangles APD and BPC are congruent
JUSTIFICATION Sides of equilateral triangle DPC are equal Sides of square ABCD are equal Angle ADC = angle BCD = 90° so angle ADP = angle BCP = 60° SAS postulate
The link is a pic of the triangle
answer is the third one
Thank you
just think about it... if you have an equilateral triangle, then the sum of that angle and the remaining angle can't be larger than 90 right?
Thats true!
in the problem it said angle ADP is 60, which can't be true
Yeah you're right
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!