calculus, optimization
yeah..
yes, maybe because we have the sides = x and bottom and top = y
differential
This is a Simple qeustion!
go on
I'll help
please
It's easy :)
Give me 7 minutes. One moment while I generate an solution!
I don't get how to start..
Almost done.
\[A(x)=(216+4x)(216+6x)\] does not require calculus to find the minimum min is at the vertex
this would be the area?
216 square inch length x width= 216
I tried something like this
what to do next?
l=18 w=12 The dimensions of the smallest piece of wallboard is 18-6=12= length and 12-4=8
I think I get it.. thank you
i hope you get it and your' welcome *you're
@Jesstho.-. Is there any logic back it up? How can you know the length of the sides are 18 and 12? Why aren't they 24 and 9? or else?
@lucaz I had the same problem with you when I took cal1. However, I have more given information than this one, (something like limit of the dimension, the ratio of the sides and so on) so that I could make equation on the given information, and then took derivative to find value of the min. To your problem, it's hard ..... to me. :)
@OOOPS it's ok.. thanks
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!