Find the horizontal intercepts of the quadratic by rewriting the quadratic into transformation form. f(x) = -4x^2+10x-5
@jtryon, are you here?
yes, I am here
You are given f(x) = -4x^2 + 10x - 5 and you want to write the quadratic in transformational form, correct?
correct, now I know that one way to find the x-intercepts is to use the quadratic formula but I saw in my textbook that you can also find the x-int. once you write the quadratic in transformational form but I am not understanding that part
The standard form of a quadratic equation is \(y = a(x - h)^2 + k\) and the transformational form is \(\dfrac{1}{a}(y - k) = (x - h)^2\) correct?
correct
Which means that if we convert the given quadratic to standard form, it should be relatively easy to convert it to transformational form, right?
no, wait
the standard form is defined as ax^2+bx+c and the transformational form is a(x-h)^2+k
yes, converting it to transformational form was relatively easy, but with the vertex that I found at 5/4, it was then difficult to plug that back in and come up with the x-intercepts
The example that they have given use a whole integer vertex of -1 so that is easy to plug in
What did you get for the transformational form of f(x) = -4x^2+10x-5 ?
f(x) = -4(x+1)^2+1.25
I think that is where I may have made and error
@Hero
Would you mind showing your steps please?
Sure -4(5/4)^2+10(5/4) - 5 -6.25 + 12.5 - 5 = 1.25
I am not certain about the (x+1) in the transformational form as I still have only a slight understanding of this form
If I got the idea of transformational form, I''m thinking it would be easier to find the x-intercepts than having to use the quadratic formula
I got something different for the transformational form
@jtryon
What did you get? I probably made a mistake somewhere
The first step I did was solve for my h which is 1.25 and then my k which is also 1.25
There are a specific set of steps that you perform to convert from standard form to vertex form.
The transformational form that they are describing here is also known as the vertex form of a quadratic equation.
First, @jtryon, since y = f(x), we can write the given quadratic equation as \(y = -4x^2 + 10x - 5\)
Yes, that is what I like to do instead of have it as f(x) or h(r)
It helps me to call it y
Next what we can do is multiply (or divide) both sides by -1 to get \(-y = 4x^2 - 10x + 5\) Do you agree?
Yes
Why do we want to change it to -y? I understand the process of multiplying both sides by -1
You'll see... Afterwards, we can factor 4 from the quadratic expression to get \(-y = 4(x^2 - \dfrac{10}{4}x + \dfrac{5}{4})\) agreed?
Ok, continue
Now we divide both sides by 4 to get \(-\dfrac{y}{4} = x^2 - \dfrac{10}{4}x + \dfrac{5}{4}\)
Since \(\dfrac{10}{4} = \dfrac{5}{2}\) we can re-write the previous step as: \(-\dfrac{y}{4} = x^2 -\dfrac{5}{2}x + \dfrac{5}{4}\) Agreed?
That makes sense
Now we will subtract \(\dfrac{5}{4}\) from both sides to get \(-\dfrac{y}{4} - \dfrac{5}{4} = x^2 - \dfrac{5}{2}x\) Which leads us to the whole point of doing all that manipulation. Notice that we have the form \(x^2 + bx\) on the right side. Do you know what this means?
That is the standard form?
Not quite. But if we add \(\left(\frac{b}{2}\right)^2\) to both sides, we'll end up with a complete square on the right side. Does the concept of "completing the square" sound familiar to you?
Yes, it is familiar to me. I have not used that in awhile.
How do we get the x-intercepts when we have changed from standard form to transformational form?
Once we finish converting to transformational/vertex form, we'll be able to find these x-intercepts you refer to.
The interesting thing is that converting to tranformational form is the complete long way to find x-intercepts.
There is a series of steps you have to complete before you convert to transformational form so I am wondering if it is faster to use the quadratic formula
It is relatively easy to identify a,b,c from the terms in the quadratic
Oh, so it is a long way of finding the x-intercepts
Basically, if your goal was to find the x-intercepts, converting from general form to transformational form is about the most time consuming possible method to use. Especially considering this quadratic.
They made it seem really simple in the textbook using the following example: y = 2x^2+4x-4 0 = 2x^2 + 4x - 4 h = b/2a = 4/2(2) = -1 k = f(-1) = 2(-1)^2+4(-1)-4=6 0 = 2(x+1)^2-6 6 = 2(x+1)^2 3 = (x+1)^2 x+1=+- sqrt(3) x = -1+- sqrt(3)
It wasn't that simple when I attempted to use it with the vertex of (1.25, 1.25)
Scan the page from your textbook and upload it here so I can see exactly how they typed out the steps.
@Hero
But yeah, they are right. The method to find (h,k) is much faster than completing the square.
Because (h,k) is the vertex of the parabola. So actually, it is silly to complete the square.
Basically the vertex (transformational) form of a quadratic is \(y = (x - h)^2 + k\) \(h = -\dfrac{b}{2a}\) \(k = c - \dfrac{b^2}{4a}\) You are given \(f(x) = -4x^2 + 10x - 5\) And a = -4, b = 10, c = -5 First solve for h: \(h = -\dfrac{10}{2(-4)} = \dfrac{10}{8} = \dfrac{5}{4}\) Then solve for k: \(k = -5 - \dfrac{10^2}{4(-4)} = -5 + \dfrac{100}{16} = -5 + \dfrac{25}{4} = -\dfrac{20}{4} + \dfrac{25}{4} = \dfrac{5}{4}\) Therefore the transformational form of f(x) = -4x^2 + 10x - 5 is \(f(x) = -4\left(x - \dfrac{5}{4}\right)^2 + \dfrac{5}{4}\) Check: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-4x%5E2+%2B+10x+-+5+%3D+-4%28x+-+5%2F4%29%5E2+%2B+5%2F4
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!