Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

is this step even allowed? if so, why?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

I don't think so but what do I know... laughing out loud

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

@kinggeorge

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

it looks reasonable

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

\(i_0\) doesn't seem to be quantified in the first statement so I don't see what's inappropriate about the statemetn...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, yes it does seem reasonable, and I have no doubt that it is false. however, what i'm looking for is why? from definition? or theorem?

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

what are you trying to prove?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it came from this exercise. Number 22. The book says it's correct.

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

is that the first or second half of the proof?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

first half. But it seems the statement I posted is used in both first and second half of the proof

OpenStudy (inkyvoyd):

ugh, I would help you, but I think it's too late at night for my brain to function properly. Sorry.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's alright lol

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!