Sturm-Louiville problem
Find eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
\[Y''+\lambda*Y\] y(0)=0, y'(3)=0
@Kainui
I was going to re-post it. But if anyone can help me hear that would be great
Yeah, I'm still pretty fresh with SL problems, I should be able to help you out.
i had\[\lambda=((\pi+2n \pi)/6)^2\]
Your diffeq up there isn't equal to anything though, so I'm a little confused.
=0
sorry
only deal with homogenous equations
Ok ok, just making sure you didn't mean to put a = sign where the + sign is.
yea. so i only dealt with the case where\[\lambda>0\]
the other two cases would mean the eigenfunctions would be 0 which weren't really relevant. Thats what i thought
Yeah, you need it to be positive for the theorem to work I believe.
yep!
When I see this though, I immediately see that you can just solve the ODE. \[\large y=A \sin( \sqrt{\lambda}x)+B \cos( \sqrt{\lambda}x)\] Then plug y(0)=0 and y'(3)=0 to find the coefficients. From there we sum up all the solutions and then use the orthogonality to solve for the eigenvalues I believe. Maybe I'm missing something, it's been a while since I've done these and I'm still working it out.
pellet. i didn't do sqrt lambda
Haha yeah I've done that more than I care to admit too.
wait isn't it the same if i let \[\lambda=\]
i just have\[y(x)=Acos(\mu x)+Bsin(\mu x)\]
\[\lambda=\mu^2\]
Yeah that's fine to do it that way, that's what I usually do.
yea. so then with y(0)=0 it implies A=0. so \[y(x)=Bsin(\mu x)\]
and differentiating that you get \[y(x) \prime=B \mu \cos(\mu x)\]
Yep you got it.
and then applying the boundary condition \[0=B \mu \cos(3\mu)\]
and thus \[B \mu=0\] OR\[\cos(3 \mu)=0\]
but we deal with the second equation since it would be silly if B=0
so \[3\mu=\pi/2+n \pi \]
Yeah, exactly. You've found your eigenvalue mu_n, you're golden now.
but when i type it in to the online quiz it says its still wrong....
so \[\lambda=\mu^2\]
and you just square mu
Hmm well can you take a screen shot or something? Maybe you're just plugging it in wrong. This is what I'm getting: \[y= \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n \sin (\sqrt{\lambda_n} x)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty A_n \sin (\frac{\pi(2n+1)}{6}x)\]
Hmm, maybe if you rewrite it as: \[\large \lambda_n=\frac{\pi^2(2n+1)^2}{36}\] it will be better? I don't know, that's really weird to me. I'm gonna take a bathroom break and relook at our work to see if we've messed up somewhere.
No worries! I'll try that.
Yea. Still wrong. Sure we didn't do it wrong if we both got the same answer
Maybe this is where we went wrong, with the cosine. \[3x=\pi(2n-1)\] If they're starting their index at n=1 instead of n=0, then this will make up for the term we're leaving out.
at n=0 \[\mu=\pi/6 \] right
Yeah, but they start out with n=1 then we're essentially starting at (2n+1) which gives 3. Since they're using n=1 with (2n-1) then we have 1 for the first number. I hope that makes sense of why. Just put a negative sign in there and you'll be right I promise.
SUCCESS
let me think about this
ah so our index shift will be n--->n-1 so that we start from n=1 right? AH MAKES SENSE
so we end up have in the numerator 2(n-1)+1 2n-2+1 2n-1
ah awesome
so your eigenfunction would therefore be \[F _{n}=\cos(\lambda x)\]
is that correct?
wait no thats wrong
\[F _{n}=\sin(\sqrt{\lambda}x)\]
ah awesome. i got it out! Thanks alot!
Haha awesome. Yeah, just a subtle little thing always has to mess it up haha.
No kidding right! Thanks alot
could you help me with this question?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!