Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 6 Online
mathslover (mathslover):

Current Electricity In the circuit of figure, find the current in \(20 \ohm\) Resistor by Kirchoff's Law.

mathslover (mathslover):

mathslover (mathslover):

@Miracrown @hartnn @BSwan @Kainui @phi

mathslover (mathslover):

Sorry, I don't know how to write Ohm in LaTeX .

mathslover (mathslover):

Oh, I missed something.

Miracrown (miracrown):

so first lets use the juntion rule ok? so imput= output of electrical curret

mathslover (mathslover):

Well, I'm making arrows currently .. thats quite tough to do :P

Miracrown (miracrown):

choose your favorive juntion

Miracrown (miracrown):

how about F ? so lets choose this direction

mathslover (mathslover):

This is what I have now.

mathslover (mathslover):

Have I done any mistake there in marking that mesh currents?

Miracrown (miracrown):

http://screencast.com/t/hQt5jrSp2geN ok so 6 different current pathways so we can already create some junction pathway equations so at F what equation can we get?

mathslover (mathslover):

Hmm , first I will have to check those good looking arrows of Miracrown with mine.

Miracrown (miracrown):

@BSwan everyone is different, so don't expect everyone to be the same! And @mathslover it looks good but very confusing with the currents

Miracrown (miracrown):

I suggest you label each current separately

mathslover (mathslover):

I wish we had a \circuitikz ... this would have made understanding a lot much easier. Okay, Mira, as you say! I will recheck mine.

mathslover (mathslover):

@Miracrown

mathslover (mathslover):

Sorry, for taking such a long time.. but the software I used was a little bit nasty I couldn't label individually as it was taking a lot of time :(

mathslover (mathslover):

Will you check them please? Are they rightly labelled?

Miracrown (miracrown):

that's alright! - Sure. One sec..

mathslover (mathslover):

AS I had not marked A,B,C ... there. So, just edited it.

Miracrown (miracrown):

so for the loop A what equation do we get?

Miracrown (miracrown):

and great job!

mathslover (mathslover):

For loop : ABFEA we have : \(\epsilon - (i_1 + i_2) R_1 - (i_1 - i_3 )R_3 = 0 \) Is that right?

Miracrown (miracrown):

correct! :) ok so for loop B what do we have?

mathslover (mathslover):

Oh.. that was right? Great! I'm not used to make such equations..

Miracrown (miracrown):

you're doing good so far !

mathslover (mathslover):

Loop B : \(\bf{BFDCB}\) \(-(i_1 + i_2 ) R_1 - (i_2 + i_3) R_4 - i_2 R_2 - \epsilon _ B = 0\) \(\epsilon B = 120 V\) and in the first equation for loop A , \(\epsilon = 45 V\) Is that right?

mathslover (mathslover):

What I just follow is : If the direction of current flowing through resistance is same to the direction of current flowing through the loop then I just need to put it like this \( \bf{-} iR\) and when the direction is opposite then the sign changes to \(\bf{+}\) iR And for the batteries, if the direction of the loop ends up at - terminal , then it is \(-\epsilon\) and when the direction of the loop ends up at + terminal, then it is \(+ \epsilon\) Is this concept right?

Miracrown (miracrown):

you were close it is a positive eB for the second equation http://screencast.com/t/efItClok2nOl

mathslover (mathslover):

So, the concept I stated above for the batteries should be reversed?

Miracrown (miracrown):

yes that is correct ! ok so now you have 2 euqations and 3 unknowns so all you need now is 1 more equaiton and you can use the junction rule for that

Miracrown (miracrown):

nevermind you need to do the third loop

Miracrown (miracrown):

so how is the third loop equation?

OpenStudy (shamim):

we hv more than 3 loops here

mathslover (mathslover):

So, third loop is actually EFDHGE \((i_1 - i_3) R_3 - (i_2 - i_3 ) R_4 - i_3 R_5 + \(\epsilon _ C\) = 0 \)

mathslover (mathslover):

o.O sorry ... I meant : \(\epsilon_C = 0 \) ..

mathslover (mathslover):

@shamim -> Yes, there are more than 3 loops, but I think, getting 3 equations will be enough.

OpenStudy (shamim):

ya

Miracrown (miracrown):

right enough is enough :P

mathslover (mathslover):

Mira, is the 3rd eqn right?

Miracrown (miracrown):

alright great! we have 3 equations to solve for 3 unknowns plug in values and simplify each equation ok?

mathslover (mathslover):

Oh I did the mistake there... \(i_2 + i_3\) ... not \(i_2 - i_3\)

Miracrown (miracrown):

yes

mathslover (mathslover):

Okay, so, this will be my test for algebra skills..! right? ;)

Miracrown (miracrown):

haha yeah :P

Miracrown (miracrown):

but easy once you get to matrix form

Miracrown (miracrown):

http://screencast.com/t/tqNHwSWHf

Miracrown (miracrown):

its mess, I know. But am to tired :(

Miracrown (miracrown):

http://screencast.com/t/XclXTX48r

Miracrown (miracrown):

so what do you get?

mathslover (mathslover):

Its really complicated... just give me 30 sec.

Miracrown (miracrown):

i got it http://screencast.com/t/bGCMnWPX1T

Miracrown (miracrown):

so what is the current though the 20 ohm resister?

mathslover (mathslover):

Naah... Is that your answer? i1 = -2.5 i2 = 4.6 and i3 = -2.8 ?

Miracrown (miracrown):

ok so from the diagram which current flows through the resister?

mathslover (mathslover):

i1 + i2 will flow through the required 20 ohm resistor. But, if those are your values, unfortunately, those don't match the books' one.

Miracrown (miracrown):

no... look at the question what is the question?

Miracrown (miracrown):

hmmm what does the book give?

mathslover (mathslover):

The question says to find the current in 20 ohm resistor by Kirchoff's law. So, the current flowing through it is i1 + i2... and the book gives i1 = 3.63 and i2 = 0.767

mathslover (mathslover):

Oops .. i2 = -0.767

mathslover (mathslover):

Though, my answer was very close to the books' one ... But I think, we did a mistake somewhere. I will restart the whole process, and check what I get.

Miracrown (miracrown):

I know this, I'm half asleep unfortunately >.<. Sorry.

Miracrown (miracrown):

I think you can take it from here and figure out the issue, I need to go. Good luck!

mathslover (mathslover):

No worries! I'll try to solve it. And will post what I get.

mathslover (mathslover):

Sure. Bbye! Good Night.

Miracrown (miracrown):

Thanks.

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

Here is the solution I reached:

mathslover (mathslover):

@Vincent-Lyon.Fr Thanks for such a nice and clear solution, but unfortunately , the answer you got doesn't match with the answer given in the book. The answer given by the book is 2.866 in the correct direction (\(\downarrow\) )

mathslover (mathslover):

@Miracrown @vishweshshrimali5

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Current division at junction E is wrong.

mathslover (mathslover):

Oh, why so?

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Similarly at F

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Okay see: For junc. E: Input current = \(i_3\) Output current = \(i_3 + i_1\) They are not equal

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Similarly at F: Input = \(i_3 + i_1 + i_2\) Output = \(i_2 + i_3\)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

They are not equal

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @mathslover This is what I have now. \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Please delete the rest.

mathslover (mathslover):

Okay, sorry, yeah that was wrong. The correct and final one is - http://assets.openstudy.com/updates/attachments/5390610be4b0172a938e56b8-mathslover-1401972700846-problemele.c2.jpg

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Okay

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Current division is correct.

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Now what is the problem?

mathslover (mathslover):

The whole problem is that we're unable to get correct answer for \(i_1 + i_2\)

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

And what are your equations or answers till now.

mathslover (mathslover):

\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @mathslover For loop : \(\bf{ABFEA}\) we have : \(\epsilon - (i_1 + i_2) R_1 - (i_1 - i_3 )R_3 = 0 \) Is that right? Loop B : \(\bf{BFDCB}\) \(-(i_1 + i_2 ) R_1 - (i_2 + i_3) R_4 - i_2 R_2 - \epsilon _ B = 0\) \(\epsilon B = 120 V\) and in the first equation for loop A , \(\epsilon = 45 V\) Is that right? So, third loop is actually \(\bf{EFDHGE }\) \((i_1 - i_3) R_3 - (i_2 - i_3 ) R_4 - i_3 R_5 + \epsilon _ C = 0 \) \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\)

mathslover (mathslover):

Those are the equations that we got.

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Second equation is wrong

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

It must be \(+e_b\)

mathslover (mathslover):

Yeah.. miracrown corrected me there, it is \(+\epsilon _B\)

mathslover (mathslover):

Sorry...

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Okay Equation 1 is correct

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

Eq. 3 is wrong

OpenStudy (vishweshshrimali5):

It must be \(-(i_2+i_3)R_4\)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!