Ask your own question, for FREE!
Statistics 23 Online
OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

@jim_thompson5910 Once again, waiting for file :P

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You forgot to apply chain rule for cos2x

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

she factored out that 2

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

it's correct

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yeah

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm talking about line 2 And how did you get from \(2x\sin(2x)\) to \(\sin(4x)\) at line 3?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

It's supposed to be: sin4x+(x^2cos2x)(2x) Then I factored out the 2x. I just forgot to write it because I was moving fast

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Wait no I dont need that. I didn't do the chin rule I did the product rule?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm, still don't see where you get sin 4x from. don't matter, you managed to get correct answer.

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yeah I agree, the sin(4x) doesn't fit

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

f'(x)(g(x))+f(x)(g'(x))

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

(x^2)(sin 2x) deriv of x^2 is 2x deriv of sin 2x is cos 2x 2x(sin2x)+(x^2)(cos 2x)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I guess 2x(sin2x) is not sin 4x

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, you forgot to apply chain rule \(\dfrac{d}{dx} sin(2x) = 2\cos(2x)\)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I don't understand why I need to if I'm just doing the product rule

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well yes, you did product rule correctly, but whiling taking derivative of sin2x, you need to apply chain rule there

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

So is the 2nd line supposed to be: 2x(sin2x)+x^2(cos2x)(2x) ???

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Or just (2) at the end?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

just 2 since the derivative of 2x is 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Chain rule: \(\dfrac{d}{dx}f(g(x)) = f'(g(x))g'(x)\) In this case, f(g(x)) is sin2x, where f(x) is sinx and g(x) is 2x

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I thought so but I wasn't sure if I was using the derivative of 2x or x^2 Yeah I understand now because if I jsut have take the derivative of sin2x u would =2x and it would be cos2x(2) would be the derivative.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

our pleasure

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay @jim_thompson5910 I know I have to do some table chart thing but I dont remember how lol An no I'm not allowed to just graph it and look, it says I cant.

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

My file isn't uploading so I'll write it out

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Let f be the function with derivative f'(x)= \[f'(x)=x^2-\frac{ 2 }{ x }\] On which interval is x decreasing? I found the critical numbers and they are x= +-rad2 right? Then the top part of the table is like -infinity<=x<=-rad2 then -rad2<=x<=rad2 then rad2<=x<=infinity ?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh I think it just sent to me so I'll upload a file now

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

when you multiplied both sides by x, you should have gotten this \[\Large x^3 - 2 = 0\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Why...?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

x^2+2/x=0 0*x is 0

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Sorry -2 not +

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I multiplied the 2/x by x and 0 by x to get rid of the x on the left side

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you have to do that to every term though

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Ohh okay

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

so things are balanced out

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

So that changes all the rad2 to cube root 2s

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Then I pick values and plug them in to see if they are positive of - right?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

+ or - *

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I'll use -2,0,and 2

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Wait is 0 a critical number too???

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

no only \[\Large x = \sqrt[3]{2}\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

this is the only root of f'(x)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay.. I plug my values into x^2-2/x right?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I'm not getting any negative numbers to show it's decreasing

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

hmm you're using -2, 0, 2 right?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh i see why

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

those x values do produce y values above the x axis

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you were right in saying that x = 0 is like a boundary point so pick a point between 0 and cuberoot(2)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh? I dont understand... lol WHy is x a boundary point exactly?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

because you can't divide by zero

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

So is 0 a critical point?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Well not a critical point but it does in the table

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I think what goes in the table is the critical numbers and what x cannot equal right?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

f(x) is decreasing \[[0,\sqrt[3]{2}]\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

that should be a ( in front of zero sorry

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

sry got distracted for a bit

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

It's okay

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

0 isn't a critical point because it's not even in the domain

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I know but x cant =0. And I remember my teacher saying to include that in the table

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

and good, it's decreasing on the interval \[(0,\sqrt[3]{2})\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Just like if it was like x/x+2 you'd have your critical point in the table, but also -2 in the table

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

maybe he was referring to a problem where x = 0 is defined?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh as like a boundary point, yeah I guess you could do that

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yeah thats what he says to do

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

then yeah, also \[(0,\sqrt[3]{2})\] is correct

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Is this right because I'm not 100% convinced in myself

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

You didn't need to find the equation of the tangent line You just needed to find the slope of the tangent line at x = 1

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

But it's still good practice

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh... how would I have done that?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you could have stopped at the slope formula where you got the result of 3 (the first time)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh so all had to do was the slope formula? lol

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yep since derivatives visually represent slopes

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

slopes of tangent lines

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Ahhh right

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay so I know to find concavity I have to find the 2nd derivative and make that table again. Did I do the 2 derivatives right?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Welll my file isn't uploading so: \[f(x)=2xe^x\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I got by doing the product rule 2x(e^x) \[f'(x)=2e^x+2xe^x\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Then I did the product rule with 2(e^x) and added it to the product rule of 2x(e^x) \[f''(x)=2e^x+2e^x+2xe^x\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you don't need to do the product rule with 2(e^x) you can use the constant rule

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

or constant multiple rule

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

What's that

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

if y = k*f(x) then y' = k*f ' (x)

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

k is a constant

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh like 2e^x^1 would be 2*1e^x

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Like the power rule?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

sorta, 2e^x = 2*e^x ignore the constant and derive e^x to get e^x, then stick the constant back on ---------- so the derivative of 2e^x is 2e^x

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay but doing the power rule helps me visualize and I still get the right answer. I have the right answer of the 2nd derivative right?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

anyways, you'll get \[\Large f''(x)=4e^x+2xe^x\] after you combine like terms

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

now find the root of f''(x)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yay I did it right

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Dont you take the ln of both sides to get 4+2x=1

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Wait is the ln(0)=1 or ln(0)=0?

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Is the critical # -2?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you set it to zero, then solve for x

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I know.. but then you have to get rid of the e^xs so you take the ln to cancel them right?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!