Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 6 Online
OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

@jim_thompson5910 You'll need this to see things http://cyh.leeschools.net/UserContent/Documents/AP%20Physics1%20SumAssign%2014-15.pdf

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I did the first 8, thought you could check them

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

ok go ahead and post what you got

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

And by the first 8 I mean 1a-h

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

a-h = ah lol sry, random...anyways, go ahead

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay the first one is obviously \[v=\frac{ x }{ t }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yep

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1b I got \[a=\frac{ v ^2-v _{0}^{2} }{ 2(x-x _{0}) }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

good

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yay cool

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1c I got\[x=\sqrt{2k(E _{el)}}\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

that's incorrect

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Darn alright

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you aren't multiplying both sides by k

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh right so would it be \[x=\frac{ \sqrt{2(E _{el})} }{ k }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

much better

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

actually, the square root applies to the k as well, it should be \[\Large x = \sqrt{ \frac{2E_{el}}{k} }\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yeah I know

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

because you divide both sides by k then you apply the square root

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I just didn't write it like that wasnt sure how to lol

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh then be careful because \[\frac{ \sqrt{2(E _{el})} }{ k } \neq \sqrt{ \frac{2E_{el}}{k} }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh I gotcha

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1d I got (I think this ones wrong) \[g=(\frac{ T }{ l2\Pi})^2\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

That denominator says l2pi it's just not very noticable

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

anything you're curious on how to write, you can ask me or you can right-click on the math equation and click "show math as ---> Tex Commands"

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Is 1d right?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

one sec

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Wait I see a flaw in it myself lol

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

unfortunately it's incorrect

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I think it's \[g=(\frac{ T }{ 2\pi })^2*\frac{ 1 }{ l }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

This is what I get \[\Large T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\] \[\Large \frac{T}{2\pi} = \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\] \[\Large \left(\frac{T}{2\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{L}{g}\] \[\Large \left(\frac{2\pi}{T}\right)^2 = \frac{g}{L}\] \[\Large L\left(\frac{2\pi}{T}\right)^2 = g\] \[\Large g = L\left(\frac{2\pi}{T}\right)^2\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Notice how I flipped both fractions to get \(\Large \frac{g}{L}\)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yeah why though

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

because I then multiplied both sides by L to isolate g

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

to isolate g, it's easier to do so when its in the numerator (not denominator)

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I thought when you have (T/2pi)^2=l/g That your could multiply each side by 1/l because l/g*1/l= l/gl and the l's cancel?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

or you can do it like this \[\Large T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\] \[\Large \frac{T}{2\pi} = \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\] \[\Large \left(\frac{T}{2\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{L}{g}\] \[\Large \frac{T^2}{(2\pi)^2} = \frac{L}{g}\] \[\Large \frac{T^2}{4\pi^2} = \frac{L}{g}\] \[\Large T^2*g = 4\pi^2*L\] \[\Large g = \frac{4\pi^2*L}{T^2}\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

But my way doesn't work?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

if you did that, you'd have \[\Large \frac{1}{L}*\left(\frac{T}{2\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{g}\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

so you'd be on your way isolating g, but not quite done yet

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Ohhh right

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

to get g all by itself, you'd just flip everything

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

to go from \[\Large \frac{1}{L}*\left(\frac{T}{2\pi}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{g}\] to \[\Large \frac{L}{1}*\left(\frac{2\pi}{T}\right)^2 = g\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Yeah I get it now

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

ok great

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1e I got \[r=\sqrt{m _{1}m _{2}(\frac{ G }{ F _{g}})}\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

good

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1f I got \[v=\sqrt{\frac{ 2mgh }{ m }}\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I gues the m on top would cancel right?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

correct, giving you \[\Large v = \sqrt{2gh}\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Oh I thought just the top one cancels because all of that is over m? Or is that if it was like 2m+g+h/m?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

it cancels with the m in the bottom as well they divide to 1 \[\Large \frac{2mgh}{m} = \frac{2\cancel{m}gh}{\cancel{m}} = 2gh\]

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay I thought so

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

I'm not sure what you mean by 2m+g+h/m though

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Like then it would be 2+g+h/m? Because that 2m+g+h/m is the same as 2m/m+g/m+h/m

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh i see, yeah if we had that then m would stick around somewhat but in this case we're multiplying and not adding

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

(2m+g+h)/m would turn into 2m/m+g/m+h/m = 2 + (g/m) + (h/m) but that's a bit off tangent

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

1g I got \[t=\sqrt{\frac{ 2(x-x _{0}-v _{0}) }{ a }}\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

correct

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

And 1h I got \[v=\frac{ r(L) } {m }\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

that's incorrect

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

you divide both sides by mr to isolate v

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

Okay yeah I wasn't sure if that's what I had to do

OpenStudy (marissalovescats):

I skipped part 2 because I forgot about it because Chem was awhile ago But I did Part 3 and the first part of part 4 and you can check that, I dont think im wrong on any of it, but just wanna double check

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

part isn't so bad really you are just going from one unit to another and you take advantage of cancellations for example to convert 25 km to meters, you multiply by (1000 m)/(1 km) you'll notice the km unit cancel leaving you with meters

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

part 2*

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

|dw:1402271747591:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!