Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (australopithecus):

If A is a 3x3 matrix for which the row echelon form has 2 leadings 1s, would this be an accurate depiction of what they are describing? http://i.imgur.com/3dZH9We.png or does d = 0 for it to be in row echelon form?

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

I guess I could answer my own question based on the rank rules

OpenStudy (amistre64):

echelon is a word that means stairs, or steps ... a reduced row echelon form is when its stepped AND has leading 1s in each row. if the bottom row is all zeros, then it has reduced to an equivalent dependant matrix

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

wait probably not

OpenStudy (amistre64):

at the moment, your setup is in a stepped row fashion with 2 leading 1s

OpenStudy (amistre64):

1 3 2 0 2 -1 0 0 5 this is a row echelon, a stepped row, form. with 1,2,5 as the leading values

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

The question I'm answering asks me if this matrix, Ax=b has infinitely many solution for any b. I put false because, if d =/= 0, the system is inconsistent

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

and thus there are no solutions for b

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

or I could just say q < p therefore no solutions where q and p are rank of coefficient and augmented respectably

OpenStudy (amistre64):

http://stattrek.com/matrix-algebra/echelon-form.aspx there are 2 competing ideas ... stattrek presents ref, as leading 1s; but notes, "Some references present a slightly different description of the row echelon form. They do not require that the first non-zero entry in each row is equal to 1."

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

So this is kind of up in the air?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its up to your specific material :)

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

I have no clue what my prof wants lol

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

and I'm using the old text book for the course so yeah.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

when theres a difference of opinions, then you simply have to go with your materials opinion :) ask your prof or see if your material defines it better.

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

thank you for the help amistre64 I will just answer it both ways.

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

I'm pretty sure your way is the way we are handling it, I will ask my TA

OpenStudy (amistre64):

no as for inconsistent ... 0=0 is always true, which would indicate a dependant set of vectors. 1 3 | 4 2 6 | 8 this system reduces to 1 3 | 4 0 0 | 0 as it should since the system is describing concurrent lines .... the same line in 2 different ways .. 0=0 always whereas: 1 3 | 4 2 6 | -4 reduces to 1 3 | 4 0 0 | -8 this represents parallel lines .... 2 different lines that never touch and therefore an inconsistency develops ... no solution is possible becuase 0 = -8 never

OpenStudy (amistre64):

typo at the start :/ *now as for inconsistent ...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

and -12 .. but my minds frail lol

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

:) well I appreciate all your help thank you so much.

OpenStudy (australopithecus):

if we assumed d = 0 though the system would only have 1 solution right by q = p = n

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if d=0 that simply means that one of the column vectors is useless in defining the most efficient number of vectors to define the system with. it means that at least one of the vectors is a linear combination of the others.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

solutions tho would be attributed to an augmented matrix such that the last column defines the equality of the system

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!