Little challenge from Frostbite based on present research. Requirement: Simple molecular genetics
Cascade is a multifunctional nucleoprotein involved in the immune system of prokaryotes against foreign DNA. Functional cascade contains 11 subunits and a RNA stand transcribed from CRISPR loki (see attachment). It’s been analyzed that DNA that got a complementary sequence to the RNA stand is able binding to Cascade. Surprisingly DNA which does not have a complementary sequence to the RNA stand is able of binding as well somehow. I like to see if this is really true, so to a mixture we are adding the restriction enzyme (Bsml) which is able to cleavage DNA. Data from the experiment is found in the attachment along with the figure. A) What is a restriction enzyme? B) What can we specifically see from the data? (What is being cleaved?) C) What can conclude about DNA binding to Cascade from this experiment? Data obtained from Westra et al. (2012)
@mrdoldum
@Abhisar you don't feel like giving a go your self?
@Abhisar as said it is a challenge so I already know the answer.
Ohh..i didnt noticed that..!!
m not much acquainted with these stuffs !
\(\color{blue}{\huge\ddot\smile}\)
nSC, OC and Lin DNA are all different DNA topology, and are not required to be known what is, to solve the problem: all you need to know is that it is not the same.
well as u said in the text A has the property of cleaving DNA molecules
B cleave is basically saying divide/ break kinda
That is correct yes. :) I suggest you compare the lanes 1-4 and 5-8. and note two things: 1) Has the DNA be cut? 2) Where is the band lying
well for C i think reason is that bases are still same meaning A T G C
not, rather the chemical bond was broken
no*
between the DNA (which does not have a complementary sequence to the RNA stand) and Cascade
Ahhh... Lets try look at it. In the attachment I've put some help to lane 1-4
hmm, well Immunity is mediated by small RNAs that guide endonucleases to cleave DNA
@alphadxg that is correct, but experiments on the well... "surveillance system" is capable of binding both targeting and non-targeting. The type of binding we don't know. So I test for if the bind is specific or non-specific :)
i have no idea how to look at it :P im not familiar with this :(
Is this 1 semester molecular bio?
@alphadxg It is simple protein science. You don't have to label stuff to different semester bio courses. Okay. I can try give a full example. It is very stright forward. :) A restriction enzyme is as you say @Somy an enzyme that is able cutting nucleic acids. To make a worked example on B I look at the lane 1-4: In 1) we only got DNA, which is going to serve as the control to this experiment. As we are not having any restriction enzyme into the solution, the DNA is uncut. in 2) we got Cascade and DNA, we can see that the DNA still haven't been cut, as it lies next to the uncut DNA band, but still we can slightly note that the band is a little higher indicating that the DNA in fact have bounded to Cascade. in 4) we got DNA and Bsml and the DNA most therefor have been cut. We can see that the band is much higher than the uncut DNA band and is serving as a control. in 3) (the actual test), it got DNA, Cascade and Bsml. We can see that the band is located near the cut DNA band from lane 4).... this means that non-target DNA is being cut by Bsml.
You can try 5-8 if you like. Same procedure.
1 and 2 are same as 5 and 6
Exactly. So that most be that target DNA and target DNA bound to Cascade is not being cut right? :)
yes
in 7 its not located near DNA cut anymore
as it was in 3
So in the 7 it does not cut? (just need to be clear :) )
yes
in 8 the cutting happens
Perfect that was B! :D So if we had to answer C what could we say there?
hmmm DNA is cut only if its alone with BSml?
i mean the targeted one
oh wait
I think you are onto the right thing :)
DNA that is Not complimentary is cut by BSml
so BSml only cuts them
waaaait
ah BSml cuts both
doesn't that mean the enzyme is non specific?
YES! exactly. To be more specific but the general idea of what you: target binds specifically to Cascade blocking the cutting of the DNA, unlike for non-target DNA, which are bound unspecific (not protected by Cascade) Well done you analyze real data from a less than 2 year old article.
lol
that's interesting xD
So many people are lacking generally analysis skills, this is basically what I teach freshmen at my institute. Ones again well done... you make your title pride! :)
yaaaay :D cool thank u!!!!!!
I'll be posting more of these kind of questions. So if you like this kind of work, just keep an eye open :P
okaaay though i'll need explanation since im not really familiar with such staff i just finished my gr 12 AS levels so i don't know much
Well you still did great. I mean all you in fact need to know is: 1) that a restriction enzyme cuts DNA 2) You know enzymes got a active site... well if the substrate is blocked or modified (for example a huge 11 subunit protein called Cascade place it self on it) then it can't cut. :)
So basically what you saw is that Cascade bind target DNA (RNA-complementary DNA) to it's active site, blocking the restriction enzyme from cutting (a specific binding). But non-target DNA is not bound in the active site but somewhere else (perhaps on the outside of the protein) and therefor can be cut by the restriction enzyme. :)
in 2 u r talking about competitive and not competitive inhibition right?
Naaa not really, that is enzyme kinetic terms. But close.
non-competitive inhibition got an effect. This doesn't :)
so complimentary DNA is just like a normal substrate target DNA is more like non competitive inhibitor
binding to a site other then active side
I try make a drawing a little later. :) then I try show what it means
okaaay thnx!! :)
what do u teach btw?
|dw:1402679416643:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!