Statement 1: "If she is stuck in traffic, then she is late." Statement 2: "If she is late, then she is stuck in traffic." Statement 3: "If she is not late, then she is not stuck in traffic." Ruby writes, "Statement 3 is the inverse of statement 2 and contrapositive of statement 1." Christine writes, "Statement 1 is the inverse of statement 2 and converse of statement 3." Which option is true? Both Ruby and Christine are correct. Both Ruby and Christine are incorrect. Only Ruby is correct. Only Christine is correct.
@wio
what is the inverse of statement 2?
if A then B Converse: if B then A Inverse: if not A then not B Contrapositive: if not B then not A
grrr so confused @wio
wait is it D?
If we say that statement 1 is "if A then B," then statement 2 would be the converse (if B then A), and statement 3 would be the contrapositive (If not B then not A).
First look at statement 2. Identify A and B parts of it. The pattern is: if A then B
So let's take Ruby's response. Statement 3 is now "If A then B." The inverse would be "If not A then not B." and the contrapositive would be "If not B then not A." Statement 2 (if we say that statement 3 is "if A then B") is "If not A then B," which makes it the inverse. So the first part of Ruby's statement is correct.
So let's take Ruby's response. Statement 3 is now "If A then B." The inverse would be "If not A then not B." and the contrapositive would be "If not B then not A." Statement 2 (if we say that statement 3 is "if A then B") is ***"If not A then not B,"*** which makes it the inverse. So the first part of Ruby's statement is correct.
had to fix that...
You do the second part and Identify what kind of statement it is (e.g. contrapositive, inverse, converse, etc.)
Ok the inverse is "If she is stuck in traffic, then she is late" of statement two
Am I wrong?
Nope! :p
Can you help me with another question?
So that makes Ruby's statement correct. Now for Christine's. If Statement 2 is "If A then B," that makes Statement 1 "If B then A," which is the converse. So Christine's statement is wrong. The answer to the problem is "Only Ruby is correct," or C
Sure, @DEEISME, just post it the "Ask a question box"
If Johan completes his project, then he will visit the museum. Which of these is logically equivalent to the given statement? If Johan visits the museum, then he did not complete his project. If Johan completes his project, then he will not visit the museum. If Johan did not visit the museum, then he did not complete his project. If Johan did not complete his project, then he will visit the museum.
What does logically equivalent mean?
It means you can use one of your logic statements (contrapositive, converse, etc) to find the answer. So if the statement "If Johan completes hos project, then he will visit the museum" is in the form "if A then B," which of the other statements is a contrapositive, converse, or inverse of the original statement?
Ohhh so it's C.
If he doesn't do it then he doesn't go.
Yup. The Inverse.
Anything else?
I have 3 more is that okay?
Sure!
Thanks
"If the alternate exterior angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel." What is the inverse of the statement? If the lines are parallel, then the alternate exterior angles are congruent. If the alternate exterior angles are congruent, then the lines should be parallel. If the alternate exterior angles are not congruent, then the lines are not parallel. If the lines are not parallel, then the alternate exterior angles are not congruent.
I just get confused in the words.
if A then B Converse: if B then A Inverse: if not A then not B Contrapositive: if not B then not A
Is it A.
So if the statement in the question is "If A then B," which of the other statements is in the form "If not A then not B?"
Oh I keep thinking it's the converse sorry it's D.
Nope! That would be the Contrapositive (If not B then not A)
Oh you keep it the statement the same it's C. I'm Sure I swear
Yassss you are!
YAY
Next?
Read the statement shown below: "If the sum of interior angles of a polygon is more than 180°, then the polygon is not a triangle." The converse of the statement is If the sum of the interior angles of a polygon is not more than 180°, then the polygon is a triangle. If the polygon is a triangle, then the sum of the interior angles of the polygon is not more than 180°. If the sum of the interior angles of a polygon is equal to 180°, then the polygon is a triangle. If the polygon is not a triangle, then the sum of the interior angles of the polygon is more than 180°.
Converse is "If B then A." Find it
D.
Yup.
Last one?
Read the statements shown below: Statement 1: If it has two sides, then it is a polygon. Statement 2: If it is not a polygon, then it does not have two sides. Are the two statements logically equivalent? No, both statements are false. Yes, both statements are true. No, only one statement is true. Yes, both statements are false.
Ahhh I have another one after this I'm so sorry is that okay?
That's fine.
Thanks
Statement 2 is the contrapositive of statement 1. So it can be either B or D. But, think about your polygons to get the second part of the answer.
D.
Am I wrong @Nairz
nope.
sorry, had to pee.
In a geometry class, the students were asked to write statements that are logically equivalent to the statement shown below: If a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then it is a radius. Below are the responses of four students. Which student's response is correct? Student 2: If a line segment is not a radius, then it joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle. Student 1: If a line segment is not a radius, then it does not join the center of a circle with a point on the circle. Student 3: If a line segment does not join the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then the line segment is a radius. Student 4: If a line segment joins the center of a circle with a point on the circle, then the line segment is not a radius.
It's cool
I think it's B
So, which ones are "not - not" or "a - b"
Am I wrong... Umm B is a "Not - Not" the others are "Not - Are" or "Are - Not" @Nairz
B is right! That's the quickest way to throw-out answers that are not correct.
Any more? Willing to help with any geometry...
Umm sure not anymore like that though, is that okay?
Yeah, that's fine. If I know it, I will help.
Ok thanks Perry observes the opposite, parallel walls of a room. In how many lines do the planes containing the walls intersect? 2 0 1 3
Okay, the key word in that question is PARALLEL.
Is it A?
No. What do parallel lines do?
They are lines that go in the same direction and don't intersect
Exactly. What do parallel planes do?
So C
No.
Oh wow it says intersect in the question so its 0
Parallel planes never intersect, just like parallel lines. So since the NEVER INTERSECT, how many lines do the PARALLEL planes intersect at?
Good job!
Martin drew a pair of perpendicular lines and a pair of parallel lines. Which of these statements best compares the pairs of perpendicular and parallel lines? Perpendicular and parallel lines have their lines extending in one direction only. Perpendicular and parallel lines always have a common endpoint. Perpendicular lines are lines that intersect at right angles, and parallel lines are lines that never meet. Perpendicular lines have only one point lying on them, and parallel lines have no points lying on them.
Another one if you don't mind @Nairz
Sure
Okay, so which ones can you logically throw out?
The first one
And?
Well I get confused a lot but it says "and parallel lines are lines that never meet." I would say this is the right answer right?
Yes. Now, the second one is wrong because they gave us no endpoints for the lines in question. So, we are supposed to assume (in all of mathematics) that they are lines that go on forever; Therefore, B would be wrong. For the 4th one, lines are made up of infinitely many points, so D is wrong as well.
Next question?
Statement Description 1 A line contains at least two points. 2 A plane contains at least three non-collinear points. Which option best classifies Saul's statements? Statement 1 is a theorem because it can be proved, and Statement 2 is a postulate because it is a true fact. Statement 1 and Statement 2 are theorems because they can be proved. Statement 1 and Statement 2 are postulates because they are true facts. Statement 1 is a postulate because it is a true fact, and Statement 2 is a theorem because it can be proved.
umm.
Let me see if I remember...
I don't know what theorem or postulate are
Postulate means that it's definitely true. A theorem is something that can be proven as true, but isn't accepted as scientific or mathematical fact.
easier
So?
Which one is it?
A or B
I'm not sure, because A plane contains at least three non-collinear points thing
If I remember correctly, it's B. I'm not sure if those are postulates or theorems. I will leave that one
So, I don't know the answer, but those are questions to ask your teacher next time you talk to her.
or him.
I will.
The figure shows a partially completed set of steps to construct a rhombus PQRS: Student 1 Fix the compass at M and adjust its width to point L. Without changing the width of the compass, move the compass to N and draw a small arc on the big arc. Label the point of intersection of the two arcs as T. Draw a line segment from P that passes through T. Adjust the width of the compass to QR and draw an arc from point P to intersect line PT at S. Student 2 Fix the compass at M and draw an arc that intersects side QP at point T. Without changing the width of the compass, move the compass to R and draw an arc. Adjust the width of the compass to QR and draw an arc from point P. Draw a line segment from R that passes through T and intersects the second arc at S. Student 3 Fix the compass at L and adjust its width to point M. Without changing the width of the compass, move the compass to R and draw an arc which intersects QR at point T. Draw a line segment from R that passes through T and intersects the arc at S. Student 4 Fix the compass at L and adjust its width to point P. Without changing the width of the compass, move the compass to R and draw an arc which intersects QR at point T. Draw a line segment from R that passes through T and intersects the arc at S. Which student used the correct steps to construct rhombus PQRS? Student 2 Student 4 Student 3 Student 1
http://learn.flvs.net/webdav/assessment_images/educator_geometry/v15/module01/0100_g7_q2.jpg
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!