I am trying to solve this interesting question by Ramanujan
Compute the value of : \[\large{\sqrt{1+2\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{1+4\sqrt{1+...}}}}}\]
I am thinking of using calculus, but not sure how to ...
Have you solved any of his other ones with square roots before?
Well this was the only one I got in my book. :( But, I will look for others
They're usually of the form like \[\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}\] try solving that, if you haven't already, it's definitely worth your time. As for this one, it appears to be similar.
Reminds me of the golden ratio?
*is the golden ratio.
Well okay first I think I will solve this: \[\large{x = \sqrt{1+x}}\] \[\large{\implies x^2 = 1+x}\] \[\large{\implies x^2 - x - 1 = 0}\] \[\large{\implies x = \cfrac{1\pm \sqrt{1+4}}{2}}\]
\[\large{x = \cfrac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}}\] Here, \(\large{x = \sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}\)
Now that you're done with that, the original one is fairly similar, but you have to be a little more clever when you solve it. The hint I'll give for the way I solved it was to solve a more general case.
Okay , let me think of it a little
I think kanui already gave the solution
Okay I have some general formula for representing a term of this problem: \[\large{f(n) = n\sqrt{1+f(n+1)}}\]
what is the n outside the radical doing?
It represents the nth sqrt
I am trying to represent a general formula
It needs to be there for each successive term inside. \[f(1)=1\sqrt{1+f(2)}=1\sqrt{1+2\sqrt{f(3)}}\] Although I didn't solve the problem going this route, but this might work as well.
This series can be generalised by this: \[\large{n\sqrt{1+(n+1)\sqrt{1+(n+2)\sqrt{1+...}}}}\]
=)
Now, since, \(\large{(n+2)^2 = n^2 + 4n + 4 = (n+1)(n+3) + 1}\) So, \(\large{(n+2) = \sqrt{1+(n+1)(n+3)} = \sqrt{1+(n+1)(n+1+2)}}\) So, \[\large{n(n+2) = n\sqrt{1+(n+1)(n+1+2)}}\] Now, let \[\large{f(n) = n(n+2)}\] Then, \[\large{f(n) = n(n+2) = n\sqrt{1+(n+1)(n+1+2)}}\] \[\large{\implies f(n) = n\sqrt{1+f(n+1)}}\]
By this I get, \[\large{f(n) = n\sqrt{1+(n+1)\sqrt{1+(n+2)\sqrt{1+...}}}}\] \[\large{\implies n(n+2) = n\sqrt{1+(n+1)\sqrt{1+(n+2)\sqrt{1+...}}}}\]
Thus, for given series , n = 1. So, \[\large{\sqrt{1+2\sqrt{1+3\sqrt{1+...}}} = 3}\]
*sigh* it worked. I calculated the answer for n = 1,2,3,4 and so on to 6. And tried to observe some rule and got that n(n+2) part.
Thanks @Kainui it worked :)
That was entertaining, thank you @vishweshshrimali5 :P
:)
oh yeah definitely entertaining
Interesting, I think when I solved it I did it wrong! Hahaha! \[y=\sqrt{1+n \sqrt{1+(n+1)\sqrt{1+(n+2)\sqrt{...}}}} \] \[\frac{y^2-1}{n}= \sqrt{1+(n+1)\sqrt{1+(n+2)\sqrt{...}}}\] It was then at this point that I made the substitution n+1=k \[\frac{y^2-1}{k-1}= \sqrt{1+k \sqrt{1+(k+1)\sqrt{1+(k+2)\sqrt{...}}}}\] From there I essentially made my mistake and said \[\frac{y^2-1}{k-1}= y\] and plugged in k=2 Hahahaha. Wow.
Even that solution is very interesting. Forget the mistake :)
I don't think this question is done. You have found the right answer, but only by doing a brute force attack on it. I would like to keep trying to find the "right" way to solve this.
Yeah you are right. There is no best solution to any question :)
I only say that because I think we are on the verge of discovering something useful and interesting. I don't think this is how Ramanujan would have solved it is what I mean.
Yeah! He was truly a great mathematician and above all a great man.
oh the mistake was that y and k are different variables ?
*n and k
Yeah, exactly. It's sort of weird. I had just assumed sort of that they were arbitrary, but in reality they really weren't.
Well I would try to find out some more similar general formulae.
I am thinking about this right now... Hmm...
bit its a limit ! it shouldn't matter for the infinite sum or root.. right ?
looking at it again, it looks fine to me.. hmm
Hmm, well I think it does. Another reason why it's wrong is because if you evaluate it like I say, the answer I got was the golden ratio. It seems like this answer HAS to be greater than the golden ratio, since the golden ratio is also posted in this exact same question by me and the only difference is it lacks the increasing coefficients of each successive square root, so in a sense it makes sense since the golden ratio is about 2.7 and the answer here is 3.
ahh i see y changes when we make the substitution n+1 = k
@ganeshie8 I know, it seems so good and I thought it was right until the very end when he solved it... and got a different answer! haha. Here is an idea, maybe equating it with this will show us something interesting. Probably not. Still thinking. \[3= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{2}{3}^n\]
tried something like that, kanui
Does it help us to express it the opposite direction using squares? \[f(n)=(\frac{f(n-1)}{n-1})^2-1\]
Depends on what is f(n).. :)
I got this very interesting formula given by Ramanujan : \[\large{x+n+a = \sqrt{ax + (n+a)^2 +x\sqrt{a(x+n) + (n+a)^2 + (x+n)\sqrt{...}}}}\]
This is a general expression for solving such type of square roots.
We can prove this formula by assuming: \[\large{f(x,a,n) = (x+a+n)}\]
Since, \[\large{(x+a+n)^2 = (n+a)^2 + x^2 + 2x(a+n)}\] \[\large{= (n+a)^2 + ax + x(x+a+2n)}\] \[\large{= (n+a)^2 + ax + xf(a,x,n+1)}\]
\[\prod_{i=1}^{\infty} n^{1/2^i} \left( \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} [1+(i+1)] \right)\]
is that even valid?
HAHA
Not so sure about its validity @nincompoop . I am trying to check it for different values of n and i.
go ahead I think the sequence is correct, but I am not sure if the notation is mathematically acceptable
Okay I tried putting n =1.
I got 3*4*....
square root of a square root gives n^(1/4) then root inside of it becomes n^(1/8) it goes on, hence n^(1/(2^i))
Yeah but the next square root must be multiplied with (i+1) only.
the index part is figured out so we just need the summation of radicand
In fact, I think its the summation part which has some mistake.
Yeah, I agree with you nin
1+(i+1)
i = 2 1+(2+1) = 3 1+(3+1) = 4 it goes on
your initial radicand is 3 then it goes on by a step
But, that's the problem my initial radicand is not 3.
look at the sequence 1+2 1+3 1+4 1+5
ohhhhhhhhhhhmybad
HAHA I need some sleep
I'll do this after my exam
Well I am very near of figuring something similar to your representation @nincompoop
you can define the product notation as a variable
if that's legal
Well I think I also did something wrong.
I tried to use derive some relation between the number of square roots the expression has above it and the number which is added to n.
I am going to solve some other question for time being. Its postpone this task for now.
* I think its best to postpone this task for now.
I've been busy doing other things, interesting.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!