surface integral
\[\large \hat{n} dS = \langle -f_x, -f_y, 1\rangle \]
\(z = f(x,y) = 4-y^2\)
i dont know the above formula..
im trying to parametrise it
we need the normal vector to take dot product right ?
Correct formula : \[\large \hat{n} dS = \langle -f_x, -f_y, 1\rangle dx dy\]
\(z = f(x,y) = 4-y^2\) \(f_x = 0\) \(f_y = -2y\) \(\large \implies \ \hat{n} dS = \langle 0, 2y, 1\rangle dx dy\)
\[\large \iint_S \overrightarrow{F} \bullet \hat{n} dS = \iint_S\langle x^2-x, -xy, 3z \rangle \bullet \langle 0,2y,1 \rangle dx dy \]
we can replace z by 4-y^2 <<<<< this is the parameterization :)
\[\large \iint_S \overrightarrow{F} \bullet \hat{n} dS = \iint_S\langle x^2-x, -xy, 3(\color{red}{4-y^2}) \rangle \bullet \langle 0,2y,1 \rangle dx dy \]
\[\int \int ||n||dudv\] isnt this the formula for surfaces? sorry, im not good with this
aahh yes you will get the same normal vector, but that would be like deriving the entire formula for each and every problem... we can use the formula for ndS directly
would the formula work for every surface integral? cos i havent seen it in my lecture notes
it works for every surface integral, we can derive it if you want... just notice the limitation of this formula : we need to isolate z
surface need to be in z = f(x, y) form for using this formula - thats the only requirement
alright thanks back to the question, would the integral limits be -2 < y < 2 , 0 < x <3 ?
lets see, its just a double integral
\[\large \iint_S \overrightarrow{F} \bullet \hat{n} dS = \iint_S\langle x^2-x, -xy, 3(\color{red}{4-y^2}) \rangle \bullet \langle 0,2y,1 \rangle dx dy\] \[\large = \iint_S -2xy^2 -3y^2 +12 ~ dx dy\]
we're left with this after taking the dot product right ?
right... ;)
yes bounds look right !
|dw:1402994453557:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!