stokes thoerem
start by finding the curl
(2yx^2 - 1, -2xy^2, -1)
looks good, next write ndS in terms of dxdy, take the dot product and setup the double integral
i have problems finding the normal vector
\[\large \hat{n} dS = \langle -f_x, -f_y, 1\rangle dx dy \]
you can use that as well for stokes?
z = f(x,y) = x^2+y^2
why not, its just a formula for normal vector and area element of ANY surface - works for all surfaces
ohh ok, for the double integral, so i switch it to polar coords?
do i*
yeah sure, the shadow will be just a circle i guess ?
yeah, 0 < r < 2 ; 0 < theta < 2pi?
looks good ^ whats the integrand ?
-4cos^3(theta) - 2cos(theta) - 4cos(theta)(sin(theta))^3 - 1?
whoa that looks complicated
yeah...did i do something wrong?
let me check...
ok
I am getting below : \[\large \iint_S -4x^3y +2x + 4x^3y -1 ~ dydx\]
it evaluates to 4pi : http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+%5Cint+%5Climits_%7B-2%7D%5E%7B2%7D+%5Cint+%5Climits_%7B-%5Csqrt%7B4-x%5E2%7D%7D%5E%7B%5Csqrt%7B4-x%5E2%7D%7D+%284x%5E3y+-2x+-+4xy%5E3+%2B1%29+dydx
I think switching to polar is not as bad as it looks... evaluating integrals will be easy..... go ahead, switch to polar and evaluate :)
okie thanks:D
the question is asking about two methods... any idea what are they ?
the other one green theorem?
because green theorem = stokes theorem righ?
green theorem = 2D stokes theorem = 3D both are same...
stoke's theorem becomes green's theorem in 2D
I think the second method is to calculate the line integral directly without using stokes theorem
\[\oint \overrightarrow{F} \bullet d\vec{r}\]
@dan815
@dan815 any idea on second method... the question is asking to calculate that work or whatever using two different methods...
Lower half of the ellisoid so we can find the ellipsde that is the intersection in the xy plane
we're still doing part a....
Oh okay, what part you on, i glanced over your work, it looks like you already evaluated it
they want it done using two different methods
ahh gotcha then do line integral :)
above was an attempt using stoke's theorem... we need to work it using another method it seems..
oh whats the path/curve ?
ohh this isnt a surface question sorry
it is a closed surface right?
yeah top is a plane z=4 and bottom is paraboloid..
okay so im guessing the boundary is that circle on the z=4 plane
we can apply stokes on just that plane instead
i need to run for lunch... y'all have fun :)
|dw:1403079244743:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!