Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

stokes thoerem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://gyazo.com/ed762ac7878864d189dd48cd75b84b4f

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

start by finding the curl

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(2yx^2 - 1, -2xy^2, -1)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

looks good, next write ndS in terms of dxdy, take the dot product and setup the double integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i have problems finding the normal vector

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\large \hat{n} dS = \langle -f_x, -f_y, 1\rangle dx dy \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you can use that as well for stokes?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

z = f(x,y) = x^2+y^2

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

why not, its just a formula for normal vector and area element of ANY surface - works for all surfaces

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh ok, for the double integral, so i switch it to polar coords?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do i*

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yeah sure, the shadow will be just a circle i guess ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah, 0 < r < 2 ; 0 < theta < 2pi?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

looks good ^ whats the integrand ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-4cos^3(theta) - 2cos(theta) - 4cos(theta)(sin(theta))^3 - 1?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

whoa that looks complicated

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah...did i do something wrong?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

let me check...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

I am getting below : \[\large \iint_S -4x^3y +2x + 4x^3y -1 ~ dydx\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

I think switching to polar is not as bad as it looks... evaluating integrals will be easy..... go ahead, switch to polar and evaluate :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okie thanks:D

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

the question is asking about two methods... any idea what are they ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the other one green theorem?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because green theorem = stokes theorem righ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

green theorem = 2D stokes theorem = 3D both are same...

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

stoke's theorem becomes green's theorem in 2D

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

I think the second method is to calculate the line integral directly without using stokes theorem

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\oint \overrightarrow{F} \bullet d\vec{r}\]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

@dan815

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

@dan815 any idea on second method... the question is asking to calculate that work or whatever using two different methods...

OpenStudy (dan815):

Lower half of the ellisoid so we can find the ellipsde that is the intersection in the xy plane

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

we're still doing part a....

OpenStudy (dan815):

Oh okay, what part you on, i glanced over your work, it looks like you already evaluated it

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

they want it done using two different methods

OpenStudy (dan815):

ahh gotcha then do line integral :)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

above was an attempt using stoke's theorem... we need to work it using another method it seems..

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

oh whats the path/curve ?

OpenStudy (dan815):

ohh this isnt a surface question sorry

OpenStudy (dan815):

it is a closed surface right?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

yeah top is a plane z=4 and bottom is paraboloid..

OpenStudy (dan815):

okay so im guessing the boundary is that circle on the z=4 plane

OpenStudy (dan815):

we can apply stokes on just that plane instead

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

i need to run for lunch... y'all have fun :)

OpenStudy (dan815):

|dw:1403079244743:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!