Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (kainui):

Noninteger derivative question.

OpenStudy (kainui):

It is known that for positive integers, this is true. \[\Large n!=\int\limits_0^\infty x^n e^{-x}dx\] And by allowing ourselves to plug in non-integer values, we can extend the factorial function to non-integer values, which we call the gamma function, and get interesting results like \[\Large \frac{1}{2} ! = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}\] So now here's where my question begins. If you play with derivatives of polynomials, it is fairly obvious that the nth derivative of x raised to the n power will be: \[\Large \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \left( x^n \right) = n!\] So is it possible to show that there are non-integer derivatives and if so, is this consistent with the gamma function? For example, \[\Large \frac{d^{1/2}}{dx^{1/2}} \left( x^{1/2} \right) = \frac{1}{2}!\]

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

theoretically i think it's possible , but in that case what is the definition of the derivatives ?

OpenStudy (kainui):

I guess that's what I'm looking to find out. I've heard that noninteger derivatives have applications in electrochemistry, and I've read some things that I didn't understand about them in the past. I like to think that x^3 is x multiplied by itself 3 times, so x^(1/2) must be x multiplied by itself a half of a time right? Ok, obviously that's ridiculous but the point is we use square roots even though the exponent is sort of weird.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

One problem is that \((1/2)!\) is not defined.

OpenStudy (kainui):

@wio scroll up. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%281%2F2%29%21

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, in this case \(1/2\) not a positive integer.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

wio its not defined on n! of 1.2.3....(n+1)! but with gamma function its ok

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

i mean there might me a space ( wich is not real ) that hold that value

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

but again the problem is with the derivative definition , which i have no clue what it could be ...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The problem is that the \(n\)th derivative equation provided applies for positive integers, and it's not shown that it applies for the gamma function.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We know \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}} x = \frac{d}{dx}x = 1 \]We could say \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}x = f(x), \quad \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}f(x) = 1 \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now, if \(f(x)=c\), then that means the half derivative can turn constants into constants...

OpenStudy (kainui):

Yeah, but you have to show that f(x) is a constant.

Miracrown (miracrown):

yes we could start by writing a general k-th derivative for the function x^n then plug in k = 1/2 and n = 1, for example, to obtain a half-derivative

Miracrown (miracrown):

if we wanted f(x) to be constant, we could use k = 1/2 and n = 0 Since x^0 = 1

OpenStudy (kainui):

Here's a fun fact: \[\large \frac{d^n}{dx^n}(e^{ax})=a^n e^{ax}\] replace a with i for added fun. See what happens if we try to use this for non-integers?

OpenStudy (kainui):

The reason that interests me is because e^x shows up in the gamma function and the power series of e^x has a lot of factorials in it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, you can always verify it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Suppose \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}e^{ax} = a^{1/2}e^{ax} \]Then we can say: \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}a^{1/2}e^{ax} = a^{1/2}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}e^{ax} = a^{1/2}a^{1/2}e^{ax} = ae^{ax} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So \[ \frac{d}{dx}e^{ax} = \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}e^{ax} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This only works assuming that normal derivative rules work for half derivatives.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

Fractional calculus interesting ...

OpenStudy (kainui):

Fractional differential equations! =P

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

yeah lol i never touched that subject =)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let \(a=0\), this implies that \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}1 = 0 \]Likewise \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}c=c\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}1 =c( 0)=0 \]

OpenStudy (kainui):

I like that @wio , very interesting. Something to note, it seems that this is a case where 0^0=1\[\large \frac{d^0}{dx^0}(e^{ax})=0^0e^{ax}\] Here is another thing I'm thinking about. \[\large \frac{d}{dx}(x^n)=nx^{n-1}\]\[\large \frac{d^2}{dx^2}(x^n)=n(n-1)x^{n-2}\] It seems like there should be remain some sort of constant "distance" between derivatives. \[\large \frac{d^{1/2}}{dx^{1/2}}(x^n)=\alpha x^{\beta}\]\[\large \frac{d}{dx}(x^n)=nx^{n-1}\] So maybe we can kind of equate the first parts and second parts some how. Maybe replace the second one's n's with m's and work something out.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus

OpenStudy (kainui):

Some of that stuff looks familiar. But I kinda want to figure this out without any help, it's more fun this way.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe using product rule, and differentiating \(xe^{ax}\) would give us info about the half derivative of \(x\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}xe^{ax} = e^{ax}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}x+\frac{d^{1/2}}x{(dx)^{1/2}}e^{ax} = e^{ax}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}x+xa^{1/2}e^{ax} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Half derivative on left part gives \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}} e^{ax}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}} = a^{1/2}e^{ax}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}} x + e^{ax} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Notice the right part is the left part with a constant... \[ y = a^{1/2}e^{ax}\frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}} x + e^{ax} + a^{1/2}y \]

OpenStudy (kainui):

I think this means at most that the product rule doesn't work for non-integer derivatives. Now that I think about it, the product rule is specifically for first derivatives, not half or second derivatives if that makes sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, that is true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Generalized product rule would be \[ \frac{d^n}{(dx)^n}f(x)g(x) = \sum_{k=0}^n\binom nk f^{(k)}(x)g^{(n-k)}(x) \]However, this uses binomial theorem.

OpenStudy (kainui):

Possibly useful, I noticed the other day that: \[(f+g)^n\] has the same form as \[(fg)^{(n)}\] Or to sort of rephrase it as the binomial theorem: \[\frac{d^n}{dx^n}[f(x)*g(x)]=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left(\begin{matrix}n \\ k\end{matrix}\right) \frac{d^{n-k}f(x)}{dx^{n-k}} \frac{d^{k}g(x)}{dx^{k}}\] I think the binomial coefficients hide the most interesting part, the factorials. It's starting to get clunky, but this is sort of how you're thinking @wio with using the product rule, this is sort of a generalized product rule and it's based on factorials. So it sort of is a problem that won't go away for us unfortunately.

OpenStudy (kainui):

lol well you got it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay, so we can let \(f(x) = 1\) and \(g(x)=x\).

OpenStudy (kainui):

The summation breaks for n=1/2. How do we add up all the terms from k=0 to k=1/2?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well there is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_series

OpenStudy (kainui):

Hmm, I'm stuck. I think I need to sleep on it.

OpenStudy (kainui):

Oh hey, I just got 99 lol.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

nice topic , and it make me think nw since there is fractional derivatives is there complex derivatives mmmm lolz or irrational derivatives

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Another repetitive derivative is: \[ \frac{d^{2n}}{(dx)^{2n}}\sin(ax) = -1^{n}a^{n}\sin(ax) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We could consider \(\lim_{n\to 1/4}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which gives you \[ \frac{d^{1/2}}{(dx)^{1/2}}\sin(ax)=- a^{1/4}\sin(ax) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But I'm not sure if that checks out...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It doesn't really work even when \(n\to 1/2\).

OpenStudy (kainui):

I just had a thought as I shut my eyes to sleep! Also, I have an answer for you wio. \[\Large \frac{d^n}{dx^n}(\sin(ax))=a^n \sin(ax+n \frac{\pi}{2})\] Now I haven't checked this next thing: \[\Large \frac{d^n}{dx^n} ( x^p)= \frac{p!}{(p-n)!}x^{p-n}\] That should work though. I'll check it in the morning.

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

ill try to work on it too , i might start from integral inverse , i saw something like this one before mmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

let \(p=1\) and \(n=1/2\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then you get \[ \frac{x^{1/2}}{(1/2)!} \]

OpenStudy (kainui):

Ok I lied I couldn't wait. It works. =)

OpenStudy (kainui):

The half derivative of that will then be (1/2)! divided by (1/2)! which is 1, which is also the answer of 1! like we expect.

OpenStudy (kainui):

\[\Large \frac{d^{a}}{dx^{a}}(\frac{d^{b}}{dx^{b}}x^p)=\frac{d^{a}}{dx^{a}}(\frac{p!}{(p-b)!}x^{p-b}) =\\ \Large \frac{p!}{(p-b)!}\frac{d^{a}}{dx^{a}}(x^{p-b})=\frac{p!}{(p-b)!}\frac{(p-b)!}{(p-b-a)!}x^{p-b-a}= \\ \Large \frac{p!}{(p-b-a)!}x^{p-b-a}=\frac{d^{a+b}}{dx^{a+b}}(x^p)\] That's pretty general.

OpenStudy (kainui):

Thanks @wio and @ikram002p you helped more than you know! Thank you thank you! I'm going to go to sleep; or at least try to. If you find something wrong with my reasoning tell me so I can figure it out haha. Thanks again, and good night! =D

OpenStudy (ikram002p):

good night !

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The reason why \[ \frac{d^a}{(dx)^a}\frac{d^b}{(dx)^b} f(x)= \frac{d^{a+b}}{(dx)^{a+b}} f(x) \]is because that is the rule for derivative of natural numbers, and so when extending to rational number, such derivatives must be defined in a way that obeys the rule.

OpenStudy (kainui):

Now I think there are some interesting difficulties. \[\Large \frac{d^{1/2}}{dx^{1/2}}(e^x)=\frac{d^{1/2}}{dx^{1/2}}(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n!})\] \[\Large e^x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^{n-1/2}}{(n-1/2)!}\] Now there are two options here. We can either say that the term that was n=0 was a constant and so we raise the index by 1 since we had determined that the half derivative of a constant is 0. (In fact it seems obvious that any order derivative of a constant should be zero). So now if we plug in x=0 we should get 1. However there are only essentially square roots here, so plugging it in should give us 0 which is wrong. So perhaps e^x is only its own integer derivative, not necessarily fractional derivative. Alternatively maybe the limit of this infinite sum ends up approaching 1 at x=0. Maybe it's not safe to assume that a half derivative of a constant is 0 Maybe there is some room in there to wiggle around, I don't know. Another thing to keep in mind is that we sort of got the half derivative of a constant equal to 0 based on our assumption of the derivative of e^ax which might have been wrong to begin with. Anyways, something to think about I guess I just wanted to write it down while it was still in mind.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!