The number of bacteria present in a culture at any time, t hours, can be modelled by the equation N=N0ekt. a) if the original number is doubled in 3 hours, find k correct to 2 decimal places. b)write the equation substituting the value of k. c)find the original number of bacteria if there were 2500 bacteria after 4 hours. give the answer correct to the nearest thousand. d)write the equation substituting your value for the original population. e)Find the number of bacteria present after 8 hours. Give the answer correct to the nearest thousand.
@jim_thompson5910 @Hero @ParthKohli @zzr0ck3r @saifoo.khan @zepdrix @jdoe0001 @mathmale @abb0t
\[\Large\rm N(t)=N_o e^{kt}\]When t=3, the amount that we started with, \(\Large\rm N_o\), has doubled,\[\Large\rm 2N_o=N_o e^{3k}\]
Solve for k.
Understand how to do that?
nope
could you show me how to solve for k, please
If we divide each side by \(\Large\rm N_o\) we get,\[\Large\rm 2=e^{3k}\]Taking the natural log of each side gives us,\[\Large\rm \ln2=\ln\left(e^{3k}\right)\]Applying a logarithm rule allows us to bring the 3k down in front,\[\Large\rm \ln2=3k\ln\left(e\right)\]Then isolate your k,\[\Large\rm \frac{\ln2}{3\ln e}=k\]
Toss it into the calculator, what do you get? :U
how can you sub e into the calculator??
mine comes as e^-
You should be able to simplify \(\Large\rm \ln e\) before using your calculator. Whenever you have a log where the `base` matches the `contents` of the log, the result is 1.\[\Large\rm \ln e=1\]So our k is really,\[\Large\rm \frac{\ln2}{3}=k\]
ohh okay
If you want to do it that way, then you would type it like this:\[\Large\rm \ln(e\text{^}(1))\]
a 1 for the power.
e^1 = e
okie, I get 0.2310
Mmm ok good. So we round it to 2 decimals then sub it back into our equation.\[\LARGE\rm N(t)=N_o e^{(.23t)}\]
c) Find the `original number of bacteria` if there were 2500 bacteria after 4 hours. give the answer correct to the nearest thousand. Do you understand what part c) is asking for? Given that at t=4 hours, N=2500, Find \(\Large\rm N_o\), the original number of bacteria.
\[\Large\rm N(4)=2500\]Plugging in this information gives us,\[\LARGE\rm 2500=N_o e^{(.23\cdot4)}\]Understand what I did there?
yes :)
Hmm so to solve for \(\Large\rm N_o\) just requires some basic division. What do you get? :U
|dw:1403394549262:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!