A wholesaler is offering two different packages of custom printed T-shirts and sweatshirts to groups for fund-raisers. One package contains 10 dozen T-shirts and 14 dozen sweatshirts for $1544. The other package contains 18 dozen T-shirts and 8 dozen sweatshirts for $1472. Write and solve a system of linear equations to find the cost, in dollars, of a dozen T-shirts. a. $76 c. $48 b. $58 d. $36
Oooh, these are fun! We need two equations, one will represent the number of t-shirts and sweatshirts as a quantity, and the other will represent them as dollars. So here we go...
Actually its not even that difficult. Here...
Let's deal with package A first. It tells you there are 10 dozen t's. How many t's is that?
120
Good. Now do the same with the sweats. How many sweats is 14 dozen?
168
Yes. Good. Now that's out of the way. The thing here is that within package A you have 120 t's and 168 sweats that add up to $1544. The equation for that then is (I have t's as "t" and sweats as "s", ok?) 120t + 168s = 1544. That is equation one. Get that?
yes
Now let's do the second equation in the exact same way. You have 18 dozen t's in that package and 8 dozen sweats. How many t's and how many sweats, then?
216 & 96
Good! Now we have a system of equations. Keep in mind here that we have a cost PER t and a cost PER sweat, and in the end they want the cost for a DOZEN. So we will do this first and then convert at the end. No worries. Do you know how to solve systems of equations?
Either the substitution method or the addition method will work here. I prefer substitution. Do you have a preference?
sub. never did the addition method
Ok, then good. I prefer the sub myself. Your system is as follows: 120t + 140s = 1544 216t + 96s = 1472. Which do you want to solve for first? The t's ok?
yes
Ok, this is a long and hairy process because it doesn't come out evenly but t = 417/360.
Give me a sec...I have to run outside for a minute be right back!!!! Stay with me...ok?
sure thing
Ok, I'm back now.
Let me check my math before i go on. I just want to make sure I'm correct.
ok
Actually, let's scrap that idea and go with the dozens of shirts. The numbers are smaller that way. Here's our new system then:
10t + 14s = 1544 18t + 8s = 1472
yes
Good. Now here...doing the math and solving for t in the first equation gives you 10t = 1544 - 14s...and\[t=\frac{ 1544-14s }{ 10}\]That's what we will use for substitution into the second equation. It will be tricky because of the fraction. But oh well.
so then what
Subbing t into the second equation gives you this mess:\[18(\frac{ 1544-14s }{ 10 })+8s=1472\]Now you have to distribute the 18 into that:
The trick here is to have a common denominator throughout the whole entire equation; that means that each term will have to be set to have a denominator of 10.
\[\frac{ 27792 }{ 10 }-\frac{ 252s }{ 10 }+\frac{ 80s }{ 10 }=\frac{ 14720 }{ 10 }\]Believe it or not it will be easier to get the math done this way.
im following continue
Add your "s" terms and move the 27792/10 to the other side:\[-\frac{ 13072 }{ 10 }=-\frac{ 172s }{ 10 }\]Now you can cross multiply.
When you do that you get -130720 = -1720s. Solving for s you get s = 76.
That represents the cost of a dozen sweatshirts.
Thank you very much IMStuck
But you are asked to find the cost of a dozen t-shirts, so hold on.
you really need to learn the addition method...also called the elimination method. Sometimes it is easier then dealing with fractions
thanks for the tip
10t + 14(76) = 1544...10t + 1064 = 1544...10t = 1544 - 1064...10t = 480...t = 48. So it costs $48 for a dozen t-shirts. That's choice c, even though it looks to me like you have a., c., b., d. Out of order? Anyway your answer is $48.
kelliegirl33...he said he doesn't know the addition method. If you read the whole conversation first.
Where he says, "sub. never did the addition method" from above. Yes it would be easier, but not if you don't know it.
I did read the whole conversation. That is what we are here for...to teach. If he would have wanted to learn the addition method, I would have obliged. I meant no disrespect.
I understand and did not mean to be short with you. I am a high school math teacher and if I am teaching my students to learn one method before another, there is a reason for it. And no...MOST of us here at this site are not teachers...we are only helpers.
I understand your position and did not mean to step on your toes. I am sorry
Np. Didn't mean anything at all. If you are here to help others understand, then you are doing an awesome thing!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!