Which statement is logically equivalent to the following conditional statement? If it has five sides, then it is not an octagon. If it is not an octagon, then it has five sides. If it does not have five sides, then it is not an octagon. If it does not have five sides, then it is an octagon. If it is an octagon, then it does not have five sides.
is it the the third one i really don't understand
or is it the first one
i think so p --> q equivalent to ~q --> ~p (3rd one)
i have one more question
ok ill try and answer it
What is the inverse of the following statement? "If a polygon does not have five sides, then the polygon is a rectangle." If the polygon is a rectangle, then the polygon does not have five sides. If the polygon is not a rectangle, then the polygon has five sides. If the polygon does not have five sides, then the polygon is not a rectangle. If the polygon has five sides, then the polygon is not a rectangle.
i think it is the last one but i am not sure
i think its D
If the Polygon is a Rectangle, Then it does not have five sides.
it was wrong but i only missed one question thanks for your help
np and sorry for tht one being wrong
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!