II
I would go with C.
For there to be a similarity, then the following must be true: \[\frac{JL}{LK} = \frac{JM}{MN}\]
THEY ARE NOT CONGRUENT
I have one more question, if you don't mind.
\[JL = 24 + 8 = 32\]
since \(32/16 = 24/12\), and the included angle is the same measure, then they are similar by SAS (side-angle-side), but not congruent, since they are obviously different sizes.
Now on to your second question...
That one is C. Transitive property of anything is basically: If A is B, and B is C, then A must be C
Okay, thank you!
np!
However, the first question you said that 'They are neither similar nor congruent', correct?
No, I was just saying they are not congruent, which means they would have to be the same exact shape and size. They are similar, since they are the same exact shape, but different sizes
So, would that be A?
Or still C?
They are not congruent. They are similar. So that eliminates B and C right?
Correct.
In order for the shapes to be similar, their side lengths MUST be proportional
\[\frac{JL}{LK} = \frac{JM}{MN} = \frac{JK}{JN}\]
since we already figured out that \[\frac{JL}{LK} = \frac{JM}{MN} = \frac{32}{16} = \frac{24}{12} = 2\] That means the side lengths are proportional
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!