A rock inside a building is not likely to be affected by mechancial weathering chemical weathering biological weathering any of these
@Schleifspur
well what do you think?
@Schleifspur d
why do you think that?
wait i think its c because a & b can happen even if it was in a building
am i wrong? please correct me if I am
how would a and b happen inside a building? it says 'unlikely', not 'impossible', btw =)
its c because it's in a building and biological weathering can't happen bc it's indoors
I don't think it's c. think about under what conditions mechanical and chemical weathering happen usually.
a?
you're not getting my vibe (uhlala :D ) I want to know from you, if rocks undergo any weathering at all inside buildings, based on your knowledge about what you have to do to rocks to actually cause a weathering effect. if you step on a rock, is that mechanical weathering?
no
right. and why is that?
mechanical w is when the rocks crack and break on their own
and why can't you cause that by stepping on them?
because we cant cause that we're not that strong of a force
absolutely correct! because you are not heavy enough. even if you're really really fat, you can't crush stones, because THE FORCE IS TOO WEAK. and this is the key to the answer. in a building, you have neither enough force nor extreme chemical condition to cause a or b, and there is of course no biological weathering in buildings either. the right answer, therefore, is D.
i was right the first time D:< lmao
yep ^^
if you had explained it like you did later, we wouldnt have had the trouble :D
its better that i learned why.
that's why you're a winner
and also why I never give the answer right away - except when someone else provides a false answer
even if you did it wouldnt be smart to take the first answer you get. can you help me with a couple more? if you have time..
it's past midnight in germany, and I have to get up for work early...I have time for one question, then it's bed time =)
How can we use rocks to determine how an area used to look in the past? <- that's the question
okay, good question! lemme provide a picture that maybe helps you find the answer
o.O that's a weird rock. i know im stupid ._. well can't rocks sometimes have fossils in them then someone can study the fossil
you would need to be very lucky to find a fossil in an ordinary rock, they are rare. let's take a look at the rock befor we break it apart. it's made up of two halfs. how do you think the left half was made? what does the right half look like?
the right half looks like granite ._.
yeah, kinda...it's all mashed up stuff that comes together in this half. let's say, that these are sediments, sand, some ores, stuff like that. now the left half. what does that look like? think about the lord of the rings.
its looks very smooth..
yeah. and it's DARK. what would you think made that?
a volcano
very good! okay. what do we know so far? - the left half clearly states that there's a volcano of some kind nearby. - in the right part, we find chemical compounds that are present in sand/ore. then, some huge force mashed them together, like...a glacier? maybe there's some kind of beach around.... as you see, we can use many aspects of a stone to find out something about its history and surroundings!
thanks sooo much! :)))
now, we take a look at the grand canyon. as you know, there a many kinds of rock that have different colours and make for a very nice view. if we now think about the river down there, and we know that this rivr must've dug through all the rock....then we get the impression that there has to have been a great plain before the river came. that's another kind of getting to the problem - but you don't use only the rock to get the conclusion :-) I'm going to bed now. good night :-)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!