Can somebody help me? I need help writing the equations for the parabolas in the graph attached. I have given the vertex.
here is the graph
@Compassionate @amistre64 @ganeshie8 @paki @iGreen @mathmale @thomaster @iambatman @zepdrix @Zarkon
now work the roots
personally i work the roots, then adjust the vertex
okay so how would I do that given the information above?
what are the roots to a given parabola?
a root is also known as an x intercept
it is the values of x when y=0
I have the intersection points of x being -4 and -1 for the first parabola and 1 and 4 for the second
lets work on the one with roots 1,4 now, by definition, f(root) = 0 and this can be accomplished by multiplication 1-x=0 when x=1 4-x = 0 when x=4 therefore f(x) = a(1-x)(4-x) is a suitable start. solving for a is simple enough by using the vertex
Okay so would I split them up and put f(x)=a(1-x) f(x)=a(4-x)
then solve?
no need to split anything up ... not sure why you would even consider that f(x) = a(1-x)(4-x) is the function, the equation, its just in a useful form and not a polynomial
okay so that is the equation.
when x=1, f(1)=0 f(1) = a(1-1)(4-1) = a(0)(3) = 0 when x=4, f(4)=0 f(1) = a(1-4)(4-4) = a(-3)(0) = 0
the vertex is when x is the middle of 1 and 4, so let x=3.5 and f(3.5) is equal to about 4.3 you say soo 4.3 = a(1-3.5)(4-3.5) to solve for a
a(-1.25)
4.3 = a(-1.25) now divide off to find a
a=3.44
-3.44
@amistre64
good, so our function for one of them is:\[f(x)=-3.44(1-x)(4-x)\] if we notice that the other is just a shift to the left by 4 we have the equation of the other one
a shift by 5 that is :)
f(x)=-3.44(1-(x-5))(4-(x-5))
ugh, i shifted that to the right ... not the left
f(x)=-3.44(1-(x+5))(4-(x+5)) thats better
now, your problem does not ask for a polynomial, just an equation ... so this would suffice.
So that fits both parabolas?
one is for one, the other is for the other
okay so the equations are \[f(x)=-3.4(1-x)(4-x)\] \[f(x)=-3.44(1-(x+5))(4-(x+5))\]
essentially yes ... -3.44 for the top as well simplify them to your hearts content
oh yeah sorry I mistyped
I'm sorry but I got something totally different by just using the vertex. I started with the one on the left, and since the vertex is at (-2.5, 4.3), the center is translated to \[(x+2.5)^{2}=-4(y-4.3)\]Solving for p in the focal point you get that p = -1 (because expanding that you get -4y + 17.2 and 4(p)=-4 so p must equal -1) so that would put the focus at (-2.5, 3.3) and the directrix would be the line y = 5.3.
But that's just my interpretation.
when x=1 or 4, that does not equal 0
your process is flawed at some point
in the geometric interpretation, the is a correction factor usually called p such that:\[y=4px\]
lol, y=4px^2
somethings off with that memory, but its still valid
Okay so @amistre64 how can we turn the equations you gave me into quadratic equations? \[f(x)=ax^2+bx+c\] ?
@amistre64
@IMStuck @iGreen @precal can somebody help me take the equations amistre64 gave me and turn them into quadratic equations?
I did this yesterday and unfortunately did not save my papers but first off, I found that the high point of the graph, which is at y = 4.3 occurs when x = -2.5. I'm not sure where amistre got -3.44. I did it a different way just using the vertex. Let me re-do and then post. Ok?
you cant have a quadratic equation with 2 vertexes
and we already worked it out, just exapnd what we got
-3.44 is the multiplier that fixes the roots to the vertex. there is a family of parabolas that have the roots (1-x)(4-x) they all differ by their vertex, which is just some multiplier value such that: f(x) = a(1-x)(4-x) a is solved when we use the vertex for x and f(x)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D-3.44%281-x%29%284-x%29%2Cy%3D-3.44%281-%28x%2B5%29%29%284-%28x%2B5%29%29%2C+x%3D-5..5%2C+y%3D-5..5 not quite the best syntax for wolfram, but notice that the graph is 2 arches.
to demonstrate a family of parabolas that have roots 1,4 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D%281-x%29%284-x%29%2Cy%3D3%281-x%29%284-x%29%2Cy%3D-5%281-x%29%284-x%29%2Cy%3D-%281-x%29%284-x%29%2F3%2C notice that they all differ by some multiplier that determines their vertex.
i do have a miscalculation when solving for a :)
Rewriting it from the formula\[(x-h)^{2}=-4(p)(y-k)\]I just inserted the vertex like this:\[(x+2.5)^{2}=-4(y-4.3)\]
4.3 = -2.25a , i just assumed the -1.25 was correct a = -1.911
why do you assume p=1?
I can't remember how I worked it...I'm trying to redo it now...getting kinda messed up!
You do your thing and I will try to follow as well...
I actually assumed p = -1 because the parabola has a max, not a min.
you can solve for p by using a root \[(1+2.5)^{2}=-4p(0-4.3)\] \[\frac{(3.5)^{2}}{-4(-4.3)}=p\]
you cant assume a value of 1
p comes out to .7122 now
since p=.1308 approx your setup gives (x-2.5)^2 = -4(.1308)(y-4.3) \[y=\frac{(x-2.5)^2}{-4(.1308)}+4.3\] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D%5Cfrac%7B%28x-2.5%29%5E2%7D%7B-4%28.1308%29%7D%2B4.3
sorry, im working the right parabola
OMG!!! Wow! That's the problem!!!!!!!
after i work the right parabola, i just shifted it to the left by 5
in your left, work the roots as -1,0 not 1,0 and youll get the same p as me
When you were solving for p up above, why did you put a + sign in with the (1 + 2.5)^2 and a negative with the (0 - 4.3). Please clarify.
I need two quadratic equations. 1 for each parabola Then I have instructions to solve those for specifics to include in the final product I will turn in. But I do not know how to convert the equations amistre gave me
i had used your left side setup, and used a right side root by mistake
the root 1,0 is for a right side vertex of x-2.5, y-4.3 the root -1,0 is for a left side vertex of x+2.5, y-4.3 i corrected it afterwards in my head
When I do the math with a + inside the (x - h)^2, I still get that p = .7122. I used your set up and did not get p = .1308
I am now also working on the right parabola, not the left.
use the left side root
then your vertex setup is in error
Please show us.
tell me the vertex
AydenCarpenter14, we will help you. Promise.
the vertex is at (2.5, 4.3) for the parabola on the right.
the equation i gave you, which i was off in a, are just addition/multipication to exapnd them
I did this and got your p value...\[(1-2.5)^{2}=-4p(0-4.3)\]
ok, so for that specific vertex, we use the root 1,0 or 4,0; i chose 1,0 the setup for that vertex is:\[(x-2.5)^2=4p(y-4.3)\]as compared to your original setup what used the other vertex intstead becuase you had typed it as:\[(x+2.5)^{2}=4p(y-4.3)\]
Are you back on the left now?
Let's do the right. Saves confusion.
i demonstarted that you presented us with a left side setup to start with
I gotcha. But let's do the right one first. K?
then sticking to the right side vertex setup, and the stated root from the right as 1,0 \[(1-2.5)^2=4p(0-4.3)~:~p=-1.911...\]
Ok, the left side of that comes to 2.25. Yes?
Right side comes to 0 - 17.2p, yes?
4(4.3) = 17.2 yes
I mean 0 + 17.2p
But the 4 is negative! Isn't it!?
the p will adapt to whatever your sign needs to be
4p gives us p = -1.911 -4p gives us p=1.911 so lets just stick to the setup given to avoid confusion
But you still get that when you divide 2.25 by 17.2 it is .1308, not -1.911
How did you get that value of p? Please clarify! This is important stuff!
For the right parabola, I have the set up as\[(1-2.5)^{2}=-4p(0-4.3)\]Is that correct?
(1-2.5)^2=4p(0-4.3) (-1.5)^2=p(-17.2) your right, i was working ahead of myself :)
Ok, so the p = .1308. Yes?
i had originally stated: "since p=.1308 approx" and then expanded it out to the quadratic to get my a = -1.911 and confused the 2 in the process.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!