The table represents data collected on the time spent studying Part 1: Create a scatter plot with the predicted line of best fit drawn on it. Determine the type of correlation (if any), and predict the model that will be used. Part 2: Find the line of best fit for the data either by hand or using technology. Explain your method. Find the predicted score for each time listed in the table.
Part 3: Find the residuals, and decide if your model is a good fit. Explain your method. (If your model is not a good fit, complete Part 2 again with a different set of points or choose a different model.)
Time Spent Studying (min) 52 37 31 9 26 40 22 10 45 34 19 60 Grade on Test 95 84 72 58 77 86 72 43 90 81 62 98
Did you try part 1 at least?
JUst plot the points according to your data, and judge it it looks positively or negatively correlated
I already did part 1 but 2 is throwing me off
Are you using technology or doing it by hand?
by hand
Oh dear lol. It is very tedious to do this by hand if you have more than 4 points.
I already got an equation for the line
So are you trying to find the predicted scores now?
yes but I don't know what it means by Find the predicted score for each time listed in the table
what you have is a line equation, of the form y = ax+b. Now, what you do, is take the x-values from your table (thhe time spent studying), and plug in those x-values into the equation to find the y value (this is the predicted y-value)
And I do that for every single one?
The point of this is to see if your line is determining if your line is good at predicting the grade you get, given a certain time you studied. (Because this would allow you to "predict" which grade you might get given a time of studying not given in your table)
Yes for every point. Because you will need this for part 3.
my equation is y = 0.965x + 45.547 does that work?
hm I didn't get that one. I used technology and it gave y = 0.9298x - 39.0438
hm no that doesnt look right lol. I think I missed a point lol one sec
my equation works when you plug in the x
yes you're right lol. I accidentally switched my inputs into the program. It's good :)
so I plug the x in the quation for all the inputs then what do I do for c
Then the residual is going to be the actual y-value from your table, subtracted from the predicted y-alue you calculated in part 2. residual = (actual y value) - (predicted y value)
you are seriously my new bestfriend lol
lol :)
just one last thing,when you plug in 60 in the equation you get 103..so do I just put a 100
no just keep it as 103. You can get values that don't make physical sense in residuals, but that's how stats works lol
you teach better than my teacher lol thank you so much
lol! awesome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!