.
That integration looks correct since it's being integrated with respect to t. Don't forget the +C
so x is the distance m1 is from m2?
if so, then how is m2 equal to x?
What's the full initial problem?
How did you define x?
so it's dv/dx instead of dv/dt? I think it should be dv/dt because acceleration is change in velocity over change in time
so your integration will be with respect to t, not x
well dx/dt represents the instantaneous rate of change of the particles x position with respect to time
ie Vx = dx/dt
that's the thing, I'm reading about the Runge-Kutta method and it's still very strange to me so I can't help you with that part sadly
you mean break it down into x and y components?
i mean i think i'm supposed to be able to just use the right hand side of dv/dt which is the -GM1 stuff and im willing to try it but since my equation is with respect to "t", do i just turn the x's into t's?
basically i think the horizontal axis is t and the vertical is x in this case
t is time x is the distance the particle M1 is away from M2. So basically the positive distance on the x axis (from 0 to M2). So I think x is still horizontal
since the problem is one dimensional...i believe x should be on the vertical axis but im not sure anymore...ugh
yeah I'm not sure of much of this problem either
you might be right though
oh well thanks jim
sorry I wasn't of much help
other people might know though
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!