0
translate as : solve for \(x\) \[3^x=27\]
are you sure you have to find the inverse of 3^x
@Cosmichaotic
no just solve it in your head
\[\large 3^x=27\]what must \(x\) be?
f(x) = 3^x so to solve for f^-1(x) we must... Replace f(x) with y, and switch the x and y y = 3^x -> x = 3^y Then solve for y.
i can't wait to see this...
xD
Wait, am I doing this wrong?
I was just solving for the inverse so we could plut in 27 for the new x?
what you are going to do is call \[f^{-1}(*x)=\log_3(x)\] which begs the question
the answer is 3?
I'm going to go do a chapter on logs and rules and stuff, I feel like I want to cry right now.
once you have written \[\log_3(x)\] and are asked to find \[\log_3(27)\] you are gong to do it by solving \[3^x=27\] which was the question to begin with
yes, the answer is 3
thanks guys
but don't fret @Cosmichaotic i was just pointing out that you cannot solve for the inverse of an exponential using algebra saying \[3^x=27\iff \log_3(27)=x\] is just saying the same thing back and forth
like when a math teacher says solve \(x^2=2\) and you are supposed to repeat \[x=\pm\sqrt2\]no information has passed they say the same thing exactly
Ah, I see - I have been working on the problem \[b ^{1.5} = 8 \rightarrow \log _{b}8 =1.5 \] and trying to solve for b for 45 minutes. Lol.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!