~ can someone plz check my work~ G: PA perp AB PA perp AC
|dw:1404883417038:dw|
Is your "prove" statement incorrect?
If you are proving a negative, you need an indirect proof.
opps .yes it is
P: AB not cong AC
Ok, that makes more sense now.
Let's assume that BAP is cong to CAP by SAS, then by CPCTC <PBA should be cong to <PCA. But they are saying that <PBA is not cong to <PCA. So, BAP and CAP are not congruent. That is AB is not cong to AC.
Assume <B cong <C PA cong PA by reflexive prop <PAB & <PAC are right angles by def of perp lines <PAB cong <PAC bec all right anlges are cong triangle BAP cong triangle CAP by AAS seg AB cong seg AC by CPCTC But we are given <B not cong <C, therefore, triangle BAP not cong triangle CAP and AB not cong AC
@ShailKumar & @mathstudent55 Thank you so much for your guys time. I appreciate it. I think Im getting the hang of indirect proofs
wlcm
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!