Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
OpenStudy (daisy.xoxo619):

~ can someone plz check my work~ G: PA perp AB PA perp AC

OpenStudy (daisy.xoxo619):

|dw:1404883417038:dw|

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

Is your "prove" statement incorrect?

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

If you are proving a negative, you need an indirect proof.

OpenStudy (daisy.xoxo619):

opps .yes it is

OpenStudy (daisy.xoxo619):

P: AB not cong AC

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

Ok, that makes more sense now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let's assume that BAP is cong to CAP by SAS, then by CPCTC <PBA should be cong to <PCA. But they are saying that <PBA is not cong to <PCA. So, BAP and CAP are not congruent. That is AB is not cong to AC.

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

Assume <B cong <C PA cong PA by reflexive prop <PAB & <PAC are right angles by def of perp lines <PAB cong <PAC bec all right anlges are cong triangle BAP cong triangle CAP by AAS seg AB cong seg AC by CPCTC But we are given <B not cong <C, therefore, triangle BAP not cong triangle CAP and AB not cong AC

OpenStudy (daisy.xoxo619):

@ShailKumar & @mathstudent55 Thank you so much for your guys time. I appreciate it. I think Im getting the hang of indirect proofs

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

wlcm

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!