Analysis and Prediction of Binding Order in Cascade/Cas3 Immunity. Molecular biology challenge by Frostbite
In the \(\href{/users/frostbite#/updates/5396fb56e4b01c619df25040}{\sf last~challenge} \), we looked at how Cascade is able to specifically bind RNA-complementary DNA. It has now come our knowledge that Cascade is not only to bind DNA, but also a protein we call Cas3 (CRISPR associated) protein. As we now got two "substrates" for the protein we want to investigate the binding order of this system \(\it in~vivo\). In order to analyse this problem there will be done a BiFC (Bimolecular fluorescence complementation) analysis with the half non-florescence protein Venus attached to Cas3 and Cascade. The results are attached to the question and contains a picture of the test and a diagram of the relative florescence intensity. A) Outline the principles in a BiFC (Bimolecular fluorescence complementation) expriment. B) Analyze the data, focusing on the bounding between the two "substrates" and Cascade. C) Propose a conclusive binding order model that can explain data. C - EXTRA) Suggest a molecular mechanism that don't violate your model and can explain data. Data obtained from Westra et al. (2012) Source: Hansen. S (2014), \(\it Review~of~Cascade/Cas3~interferes~cycle~in~CRISPR~type~I-E\) Last times main contributors: @Somy
NOTE: the questions follow Bloom's taxonomy.
alright everything is clear but labeling in pic is not <.<
i remember from previous work and the diagrams i made that cascade cuts DNA by binding to it
i see so it also binds to Cas3 protein so that means either its shape in like Cas3's active site or it binds to other side of Cas3 other than its active site
so now 2 substrates are DNA and Cas3
i don't really know what does Bimolecular fluorescence complementation do but im reading here and it says its used to 'validate protein interactions' meaning prove/ show
i don't quite get what is 'infected' and 'uninfected' and by what?
Well Cascade did not cut DNA (at least not alone). But we saw from the last experiment that Cascade is able to bind RNA-complimentary DNA which usually comes from viruses or pasmids. So when it say infected we mean that our cells has been infect with pasmid DNA. :)
So I suggest. Start by reading about BiFC then do B) :)
ah! i remembered! it was blocking active site thus preventing the cut by i don't remember what
But this time we simply want to find out what is happening: If we say Cascade = A, DNA = B, and Cas3 = C. Then we try find out what is working: A + B + C -> AB + C -> ABC A + B + C -> AC + B -> ABC A + B + C -> ABC We just want to find the binding order :)
That is why the experiment is gonna reveal :)
hmm i see
first pic uninfected so its cascade alone?
Yes :) Cascade alone.
The whole first row
yes
idk whats phase lambda but i see the color yellow i suppose there is protein interaction
Or wait sorry Cascade AND Cas3
In the first row
oh i see
Phage you know what is... that is a virus :)
So it is virus DNA.
yes i know
hmmm
alright so first row is Cascade+Cas3
second row doesn't look like its 3 things it looks like they got separated
or im getting a wrong idea
Second row is virus DNA (RNA complimentary), Cascade and Cas3
Third row is virus DNA (not RNA complimentary), Cascade and Cas3
yes but not together thats what i was thinking
What do you mean together?
ah nvm lol i don't get those pics
Okay. Lets start from the top: What is BiFC? :)
Then I help you understand
(look at the wiki page)
bimolecular fluorescence complementation shows protein-protein interaction
How can you see that two proteins interact from BiFC?
The BiFC assay is based on structural complementation between two non-fluorescent N-terminal and C-terminal fragments of a fluorescent protein.
its not written or im missing it but im guessing - color?
'emit its fluorescent signal'
Exactly! :) So when two proteins interact they fluorescent :) (see drawing below)|dw:1405174788001:dw| |dw:1405174857167:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!