A car of mass M = 1400kg traveling at 65.0km/hour enters a banked turn covered with ice. The road is banked at an angle θ = 20degrees, and there is no friction between the road and the car's tires. What is the acceleration?
i got \[\Sigma x = nsin(\theta)=ma \] and \[\Sigma y=ncos(\theta)=mg\] so n =1460. a should then be \[1460\sin(20)/1400\]=.95 but mastering physics says it's wrong. says it's 3.57. what did i do wrong?
ok, seriously? wtf....a=v^2/r, so if the velocity is 65 km/hr makes it 1083m/s^2/3.57=r, right? if a=3.57 as mastering physics said? but that answer is wrong too!!! this is bull!!!
Are you having trouble finding r? mv^2/r = centripetal force
Is the question for radius or acceleration?
both. it has multiple parts. wants you to find acceleration first then radius
i've gone through the hints and i got the sum of the forces right. it led me up until getting the actual acceleration...gave me the sum of the forces and the normal force. it was simple algebra to solve for a, or so i thought.
\[\sum F(x) =\frac{ mv^2 }{ r } = nsin \theta \] \[\sum F(y) = ncos \theta - mg = 0 \implies n = \frac{ mg }{ \cos \theta }\] \[\frac{ mv^2 }{ r } = \frac{ mg }{ \cos \theta } \sin \theta \implies r = \frac{ v^2 }{ gtan \theta }\]
masses cancel out there leaving acceleration being g*sin(theta)/cos(theta) which gives me the wrong answer still. what the hell am i missing???
a=gsin(theta)/cos(theta)=21.9, not 3.57 which is what the answer is supposed to be...this is really pissing me off.
a=9.8tan(20)=21.9...........................mastering physics says a should equal 3.57.......................
i did it in a calculator....
are you in degree mode?
i thought i was....not sure how it got switched over.....i had it in degrees when i was doing homework yesterday.....
thanks. makes more sense now
yw
\[\frac{ 1 km }{ 1000m } \times \frac{ 3600s }{ 1 h }\]
oh god, i feel stupid. 60 seconds in an hour.......this is what happens when i'm frustrated. stupid mistakes ensue.......thanks
That's for converting m/s to km/h, just go backwards for m/s. Haha no worries :) it happens. I was looking at your problem and was like how the heck did you get 65 km/h to become 3x the speed of sounds haha, but yeah I hope it makes sense now.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!