Indicate the method you would use to prove the two 's . If no method applies, enter "none". Options given: SSS SAS ASA AAS None
Well you are given that 1 side and all 3 of the angles are congruent
so SSS?
No, that would be if all the the sides are congruent. Which one of those has 2 angles and 1 side being congruent?
the right one, right?
What do you mean right one ? Its ASA
I don't even know. This is my first time seeing a question like this, with no explanation of what any of this means.
Okay let me show you what I mean, it is asking you which postulate would you use to provve that the 2 triangles are congruent, The SSS- If all 3 sides of 2 triangles are congruent, the triangles are congruent The SAS-If 2 sides and the included angle of two triangles are congruent, the triangles are congruent The ASA- If 2 angles and the included side of the 2 triangles are congruent (like in this picture they are) then the triangles are congruent The AAS- If 2 angles and the non included side are congruent, then the 2 triangles are congruent
Let me show you an example of an included angle/ side :|dw:1405468917824:dw| because it is in between the 2 angles
oh okay. I'm understanding now.
So that picture would be ASA like in the diagram we have, but if the side that was congruent was like this :|dw:1405469041635:dw| It would be an AAS because it isnt inbetween the 2 angles
Do you wan to see what included/non-included angles look like too?
sure!
|dw:1405469134858:dw| This one would be SAS because the angle is in between the sides
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!